Poll: Is the true reason we hate MW2 because the game or the people who play it?

Recommended Videos

subject_87

New member
Jul 2, 2010
1,426
0
0
The game itself is alright, although it seems like everyone's bones are made of cardboard judging by how easily they die; it's definitely the people surrounding it that have given it such a bad rap, and rightfully so.
 

Vyper1X

New member
Oct 15, 2009
77
0
0
The game isn't perfect but i'd be playing a lot more if it wasn't for all the camping and glitching etc.
Very rare you find a game where you can stick your head up without being shot by some camper who thinks he's awesome.
 

Bon_Clay

New member
Aug 5, 2010
744
0
0
The game itself clocks in at about a "meh". Nothing worthy of hate, but nothing groundbreaking or amazing. If you like FPS games, its alright, if not it has nothing of interest for you.

The fact it got so much attention is why there was a backlash of hate from people who saw this as undeserved, and that its fans were ignorant of what are truly amazingly done games.
 

G-Force

New member
Jan 12, 2010
444
0
0
LogicNProportion said:
I believe Pimppeter2 and his review-buddy (who's name I can't remember) has a review/debate on this. Was very entertaining and very well though out.

I would say the game, though. I don't know if it's just me, but I almost never run into the dumb-asses most of you guys seem to. Do I hate snipers? Yes. Is there always a lot of snipers in a shooter? Yes. Do I sneak around and knife them all? HELL YES!

However: *Ahem*

NOOB-TUBING IS UNFORGIVABLE!
Link to said debate please? This sounds like a real interesting read
 

zaiggs

New member
Sep 18, 2010
93
0
0
I feel like MW2 is like Die Hard 4.

Die Hard 4 is a great for what it is. It's a good action movie with lots of what makes the action genre good; explosions and gunfights. But the movie is no "examination of the human condition" and any delusions to such would, for the most part, be foolish.

It's pretty much the same case with MW2. It's a good action game, and perhaps one of the better newer ones. However, it's not the "greatest game ever" or anything, and I think it's the players that think it is the greatest game ever that creates bad connotations towards the game and players of the game.

As with anything, there are people who ruin it for everyone else and give groups a bad name. I personally enjoy certain aspects of MW2, but I realize (and I'm sure others realize as well) that my opinion of a game isn't necessarily the same as someone else's and to force my opinion on someone else is foolish and stupid (and vice versa).

Once you get online with any game, you're going to run into people that are less than civilized when interacting with complete strangers. I have yet to find any online game where the community is made up of people who are always respectful.
 

zombiesinc

One day, we'll wake the zombies
Mar 29, 2010
2,508
0
0
I enjoy playing it online, but I hate the players. I refuse to use a mic if I'm playing without any friends. And if I'm playing with friends, I'll only play Ground War so I don't have to listen to anyone else.

Glitches, noob tubes, and campers frustrate me, but listening to irritating people spam their mic is far worse.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Genesis_Man said:
lacktheknack said:
I hate it for what it is: YET ANOTHER war shooter.
Should they make a non-war shooter?
More would be nice. Or better yet, how about a non-shooter?

I'm still waiting for the sequel that "Clone" promised me... or another "Gubble"... or another "Mirror's Edge"... thus, I am always disappointed.
 

Chris Sandford

Nope, no title.
Apr 11, 2010
244
0
0
lacktheknack said:
Genesis_Man said:
lacktheknack said:
I hate it for what it is: YET ANOTHER war shooter.
Should they make a non-war shooter?
More would be nice. Or better yet, how about a non-shooter?

I'm still waiting for the sequel that "Clone" promised me... or another "Gubble"... or another "Mirror's Edge"... thus, I am always disappointed.
Blanko2 said:
Genesis_Man said:
lacktheknack said:
I hate it for what it is: YET ANOTHER war shooter.
Should they make a non-war shooter?
y'could argue that, say, painkiller isnt one, or ghostbusters.
or super mario sunshine.
True that. I forgot about those (i could argue painkiller is a war between Heaven/Hell or something like that) but i generally think of shooters and war. For the most part they go hand and hand, Shooters (generally) involves weapons to be fired at enemies, which generally cause people to die. Which is a big part of war.
 

dibblywibbles

New member
Mar 20, 2009
313
0
0
the single player was fun but short. the multiplayer was fun for awhile but when Bad company 2 came out, I tossed that ***** to the side(with a rather remarkable 60 dollar trade in) because in my not so humble opinion, Bad company 2 killed it in every way possible. Multiplayer got tired super quickly and with the outrageous price for the map packs, they can go fuck themselves. I'm still buying black ops though. Lesson learned? I think not!
 

TheTaco007

New member
Sep 10, 2009
1,339
0
0
It's an extraordinarily flawed game, and it caters to the worst of the online community.

Therefore BECAUSE the game is bad, the people who play it are the biggest assholes in the world.

So really, it's both.
 

CombiBlood

New member
Nov 18, 2009
158
0
0
TheTaco007 said:
It's an extraordinarily flawed game, and it caters to the worst of the online community.

Therefore BECAUSE the game is bad, the people who play it are the biggest assholes in the world.

So really, it's both.
not all people, a good 8% aren't assholes
 

TheTaco007

New member
Sep 10, 2009
1,339
0
0
CombiBlood said:
TheTaco007 said:
It's an extraordinarily flawed game, and it caters to the worst of the online community.

Therefore BECAUSE the game is bad, the people who play it are the biggest assholes in the world.

So really, it's both.
not all people, a good 8% aren't assholes
But it only takes 1 asshole to ruin an entire lobby.
 

archvile93

New member
Sep 2, 2009
2,564
0
0
TPiddy said:
The same complaint I had for MW 2 is the one I now have for NHL 11. The competitive multiplayer is horribly unbalanced. I don't know that much about MW 2's micro-transactions or other cash grabs outside of a few maps, but NHL 11 allows players to buy boosts that increase their performance. The performance is largely based on these numbers and those with extra money to plunk down can quickly come in and dominate, regardless of their actual skill level. There's also no match-making to pair you up against a similarly rated opponent, so quite often games turn into mismatches.

MW 2 is the same in the sense that it doesn't care about providing a balanced multiplayer experience. For some reason, its players are more tolerant of the broken game play, yet they love to complain about it, making the community just as bad as the game. At least Halo, TF 2 and others provide an environment where veterans are given the same options as relative newbs and skill is allowed to rule the day. Gears is mainly like this as well, though it suffers from host lag and a few cheap tactics.
Have to disagree with TF 2. People who get more achievements unlock new weapons (a great way to discourage team play as if just people abandoning their team to get the achievements for their own sake wasn't enough), not to mention the more you play the more hats you gets, some of which bost stats.

OT: The reason people complain about MW2 is the multiplayer is broken, simple is that. Also, I've never once seen the host migration work.
 

BlumiereBleck

New member
Dec 11, 2008
5,402
0
0
My opinion on this poll is "It sucks on its own" I never enjoyed the modern warfare series nor anything past cod 3. It got to unrealistic(I know, but even for a video game)
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,073
0
0
for the most part its the game, the game itself is incredibly broken and unbalanced, put that with the maps and it does not help at all. now when you mix in idiots who do at nothing to win and constantly say "its there, so im going to use it!?!?!?!! mwahaha you suck noobz! i owned you!" then it becomes a passion to dislike the game.

oh and who ever said it was because "its trendy" has no clue, its not because its trendy, mw1 was/is better in so many aspects that its not even funny, and that game had a shit ton of followers and most people never had anything bad to say about that game, regardless of if they loved it or didn't care for it really. so the whole hate on mw2 thing stems totally from the game being what it is, not because if its trendy or not, hell most people who hate it were the first ones to buy it
 

Slick Samurai

New member
Jul 3, 2009
337
0
0
MW2 is a popular game, the more people talk about the popular game, the more people who don't play get mad at it. The madder the people get, the louder they get. Once the popularity reaches mainstream, the people who play stop talking so much about it.

However, the mad people don't care anymore, as they are still mad at it. Now the people who didn't have an opinion on the matter have no one else to listen to except the mad people. These people join the mad people in their pointless crusade to show people how mad they are. It snowballs like this until, voila, you've got a bunch of people inspecting an old popular game under a microscope and pointing out every single flaw at the drop of a hat, because people talked about it a lot a while back.

Last time I'll post about MW2.... maybe.