Electrogecko said:
Basically, what I've been trying to say this whole time is that a person will treat every single other they meet in a different way depending on what is known about them. Like it or not, a person's sex is one of, if not the first thing you notice about someone when you look at them, and pretending that that bit of information doesn't change anything about the way you treat them is naive.
Oh look, here we have "It has to be true and if you disagree you're naive!" Add that on to the fact you're making an excuse that would at best apply to involuntary action and trying to apply it to conscious reasoning, which invalidates that load of crap anyway.
There are no two people in this world that I treat the same way, and you can claim all you like that you're different, but nobody will believe you, and if they did, they wouldn't respect you for it; they'd think you were incredibly weird.....robotic....frighteningly detached from a wide range of brain functions, for better or for worse.
More conflating of excuses that only apply to the subconscious with the conscious? Fun.
Sorry if this argument is too scientific for you, but humans tend to notice patterns on a day to day basis, and one of the patterns that everybody (except maybe you) picks up on are the subtle differences between men and women.
I think you misunderstood scientific to mean "Because I said so and I have no proof"
Again, you can claim that you don't let these observations affect the way you treat people, but you're only kidding yourself and you're probably in the minority in thinking that doing so is sexist or even offensive in the slightest.
Unproven claim, further sad attempt to excuse conscious behavior with subconscious.
I appreciate all the knowledge that I pick up throughout my days. I don't disregard any of it, or pretend that it's even possible to do so completely if I wanted to.
Yeah, bullshit. Your knowledge is pretty much half biased junk you made up.