We also managed without -1 and i, but these are certainly numbers.Tharwen said:Several civilisations managed without one for thousands of years at a time, so that implies that it isn't. It's hard to say anything about it though, since it's literally our best representation of nothing. Can nothing exist as an entity?
What i mean, is that it cant be physically represented.glodud said:it wouldn't physically exist, but numbers aren't physical.kouriichi said:You made my day 8)TheGreenManalishi said:Zero is digital god.
Oh, and no, i dont think its a number.
You cant show its value because it has no value. it has no mass, matter, weight or form.
And because anything with no mass, matter, weight or form scientifically does not exist, 0 does not exist.
0 is a representation of a value, just like every other number. If you want to use your examples, we can easily state that there are 0 atoms of Haffloffadium. Since I just made it up off the top of my head, we can confidently state that there exists 0 atoms of it anywhere in the universe.crystalsnow said:-snip-
You can see 0 cats at the moment (im guessing). However, as it happens any number itself is conceptual. If you like arguments like this, check out some of the arguments as to exactly what a definition of 1 is.kouriichi said:_snip_
you cant show 0 of something, because its nothing.
It has no value. you cant lable something as 0, without it not existing to begin with.
See what im getting at? XD
But they were never fundamental bases of a number system.YouBecame said:We also managed without -1 and i, but these are certainly numbers.Tharwen said:Several civilisations managed without one for thousands of years at a time, so that implies that it isn't. It's hard to say anything about it though, since it's literally our best representation of nothing. Can nothing exist as an entity?
That makes an Indian comedian look like an asshole if true...Ekonk said:It's the most important number ever. Every modern technology you see today couldn't have been made without the zero.
We're not sure who thought of the zero. The general consensus is that it was a Chinese mathematician, a long long time ago.
night dude.Tharwen said:But they were never fundamental bases of a number system.YouBecame said:We also managed without -1 and i, but these are certainly numbers.Tharwen said:Several civilisations managed without one for thousands of years at a time, so that implies that it isn't. It's hard to say anything about it though, since it's literally our best representation of nothing. Can nothing exist as an entity?
[sub]I won't respond to anything else you say until tomorrow due to this annoying period of unconsciousness I put myself into every night.[/sub]
Well you can see 1 cat.YouBecame said:You can see 0 cats at the moment (im guessing). However, as it happens the number itself is conceptual. If you like arguments like this, check out some of the arguments as to exactly what a definition of 1 is.kouriichi said:_snip_
you cant show 0 of something, because its nothing.
It has no value. you cant lable something as 0, without it not existing to begin with.
See what im getting at? XD
I've never really thought about it that way. Being a placeholder, that does make sense. It has no value, therefore it cannot TRULY exist as a number. *votes no*crystalsnow said:I claim that zero is more of a concept than a number. It is a placeholder to theorize the space between positive and negative.
Of course, I understand the other side of the argument. If you don't have any apples around, then there must be 0 apples right? This starts bringing in semantics. Yes, I have 0 apples in my room at this current time. No, that does NOT make 0 a number. I can also say no apples are in my room. Is 'no' a number? Absolutely not.
Haha, ultimate finishing line. Loved that.crystalsnow said:I will set a puppy on fire with my mind.
I see what you're getting at, unfortunately, what you're getting at is wrong. Show me 1. You can't because 1 is an abstract concept, as is zero, numbers themselves are abstract, numbers represent a quantity of something concrete, all numbers are abstract means of representing how many of a concrete object exist, zero representing none doesn't make it any more abstract than any other number.kouriichi said:Show me 1 cat.
Now show me 0 cats.
you cant show 0 of something, because its nothing.
It has no value. you cant lable something as 0, without it not existing to begin with.
See what im getting at? XD
there is no such thing as negative distancecrystalsnow said:For another example, say you travel -1 miles forwards. Well all that means is that you traveled 1 mile BACKWARDS. Positive and negative imply direction.
Your example doesn't work. I can show you something without any cats, and there are 0 cats. Not disagreeing with you, but the example doesn't work.kouriichi said:What i mean, is that it cant be physically represented.glodud said:it wouldn't physically exist, but numbers aren't physical.kouriichi said:You made my day 8)TheGreenManalishi said:Zero is digital god.
Oh, and no, i dont think its a number.
You cant show its value because it has no value. it has no mass, matter, weight or form.
And because anything with no mass, matter, weight or form scientifically does not exist, 0 does not exist.
Show me 1 cat.
Now show me 0 cats.
you cant show 0 of something, because its nothing.
It has no value. you cant lable something as 0, without it not existing to begin with.
See what im getting at? XD