this, they were cheating, they have to live with the consequencespretentiousname01 said:.....right.....
People using 3rd party programs to change game mechanics.
good luck convincing 15million people.
Let me know when you've got 3.
People getting punished for cheating?Sinspiration said:Cheaters are people without the skill, time, or effort, to beat the game the right way.
Soooo no, I'm not with you.
What this guys said, I'm sure it was all just some mistake and blizzard is going to be working on it.JeanLuc761 said:While I do agree that banning someone for using single-player-only cheats is a bad thing, I'm going to be blunt and say that you're completely overreacting.
Here's what's most likely going on: Blizzard's system is designed to detect programs that function as exploits (a trainer falls under this qualification). Because of this, the system automatically flags the account using said trainer, and is automatically suspended. Frustrating, arguably wrong, but understandable.
What Blizzard should do here is change the detection system to look for exploits ONLY for online servers, while letting SP gamers do their thing.
This is certainly no reason to stop supporting Blizzard. Worse comes to worse, beat the game the old fashioned way; by the rules.
I would be mad atyou for dissing blizzard if I cold stop staring at your avatar. Not really but oooooo he opens his mouth then closes it then.....katsumoto03 said:Boycott them over this? God, there's so many better things to boycott them over. Go find a real reason.
Pretty much.TheEggplant said:OT: I agree I think I'm done with Blizzard. REAL ID, recurring activation, dumping true LAN and multiplayer spawning, seriously a company this suddenly abusive needs to be taken down a few ego pegs.
The only difference between cheating offline and cheating online is user discretion, not an enormous software hurdle. In order for Blizzard to distinguish if a player cheated online only, offline only, or both, they would need to examine all of that players games on a per game basis. It is much more efficient to ban at the first sign of any ban, which they are allowed to do: the EULA that all players agree to says that if they cheat in any form, they can be banned from Starcraft 2, or from all Battle.net features.Shock and Awe said:I have to agree with you. Banning cheaters in multiplayer is obviously a very good thing. Single Player on the other hand does not effect anyone except that one person so fucking with that is no good reason to basically make someone's 60 dollar purchase worthless.
To quote a box: Whoa, that's an important piece of information man.ProfessorLayton said:Eh, Blizzard is a part of Activision now
Easy, some of the pirates out there are fairly clever, and if its possible with Starcraft 2 (which it is) I doubt Diablo will be different.TheEggplant said:And I'd love to see you try to play Diablo III without activating it first.hittite said:B, b, b, but, I need my Diablo fix. Sorry, I generally play on a PC that isn't even connected to the internet. I'd love to see them try and lock me out of that.