Obama is president now. Pre-Obama USA doesn't exist anymore, also he doesn't seem to be doing anything that different from what Bush was doing.(I am now burning as a heretic.)Trivun said:Nukes. Because pretty soon some country is going to develop nuclear weapons that rather than stockpiling they actually fire (my guesses would be pre-Obama USA [not post-Obama, cause he's smart enough to restrain from it], China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea) on someone. Then we get a chain reaction and the Cold War will be but a distant memory (it's never really ended, you know), as we all end up in a world like Fallout 3 but without the vaults and survivors.
And it would be awesome...hubertw47 said:I will pour branston pickle on my no more heroes case.
I am actually aware of all that. On all counts. Especially the heretic one, since I'm the one lighting the purifying flames...Sewblon said:Obama is president now. Pre-Obama USA doesn't exist anymore, also he doesn't seem to be doing anything that different from what Bush was doing.(I am now burning as a heretic.)Trivun said:Nukes. Because pretty soon some country is going to develop nuclear weapons that rather than stockpiling they actually fire (my guesses would be pre-Obama USA [not post-Obama, cause he's smart enough to restrain from it], China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea) on someone. Then we get a chain reaction and the Cold War will be but a distant memory (it's never really ended, you know), as we all end up in a world like Fallout 3 but without the vaults and survivors.
Now your initial post makes even less sense, since we are in different countries how could that be you burning me.Trivun said:I am actually aware of all that. On all counts. Especially the heretic one, since I'm the one lighting the purifying flames...Sewblon said:Obama is president now. Pre-Obama USA doesn't exist anymore, also he doesn't seem to be doing anything that different from what Bush was doing.(I am now burning as a heretic.)Trivun said:Nukes. Because pretty soon some country is going to develop nuclear weapons that rather than stockpiling they actually fire (my guesses would be pre-Obama USA [not post-Obama, cause he's smart enough to restrain from it], China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea) on someone. Then we get a chain reaction and the Cold War will be but a distant memory (it's never really ended, you know), as we all end up in a world like Fallout 3 but without the vaults and survivors.
(On that note, I'm actually British, but given our government I'd much rather live in the USA)
I see what you did therelacktheknack said:Religiously based, cause I'm religious.
Ughhh Albert Einstein is rolling over in his grave. (technically his fault for atomic weapons even though he was against it). Stick vs. Stick. Gun vs. Gun. Whats the fun in having a stick or gun so big it ends the world?Trivun said:Nukes. Because pretty soon some country is going to develop nuclear weapons that rather than stockpiling they actually fire (my guesses would be pre-Obama USA [not post-Obama, cause he's smart enough to restrain from it], China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea) on someone. Then we get a chain reaction and the Cold War will be but a distant memory (it's never really ended, you know), as we all end up in a world like Fallout 3 but without the vaults and survivors.
First option dude, I destroy the world in a blaze of AWESOME.Bertruam said:I would prefer an end that would be awesome to watch. Something like reality being torn a sunder. I'm pretty sure that would be pretty spectacular. I voted other because i was unsure how reality would shatter. Paradox that could not correct itself, misfire machine (like a teleport or something), or massive celestial cataclysm.