Poll: Kill one, kill a thousand, spare one, spare a thousand?

Recommended Videos

awesomeClaw

New member
Aug 17, 2009
1,831
0
0
Ok. So let´s say their´s this guy, he has molested and burned your children to death, he has raped your and killed your wife (slowly). And he has cut of one of your fingers. Now, you have him at a gunpoint. However, he has a bomb that is set to explode the minute his pulse stops, and it will kill 1000 people. If you choose to kill him, they die. If you choose to let him go, he will never repeat what he has done, and a thousand people will live.

EDIT: Crap, wrong forum, sorry.
 

ddq5

I wonder what the character limi
Jun 18, 2009
415
0
0
I'm unmarried and without children and I've never really trusted my right pinky. Wouldn't shoot him, regardless, though.
 

Axeli

New member
Jun 16, 2004
1,064
0
0
It would be one of those moments where I'm glad I know death isn't much of a punishment anyway.

I.e. third option: Cut out his eyes or something else fun.
 

Daveman

has tits and is on fire
Jan 8, 2009
4,202
0
0
So I get a choice of killing 1001 people or none.

Erm, I pick none.

I'd just torture him up a bit... :p

Nah, I'd probably just shoot myself. I wouldn't be able to live after that.
 

mip0

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2009
404
1
23
Well I guess shoot without killing. I'd shoot him in his feet and hands. I'd like to be able to torture him like that but eventually I'm going to run out of bullets. Realizing this I'd disable him with what bullets I have so that I'd still be in control when I'm out of bullets.
After that I'd just torture him till he chooses to disarm the bomb so that I can end his suffering. (Then I'd destroy the bomb, lock him up, go buy bullets, get him, hand him over to the police and shoot myself.)

I don't know if this is "Yes" or "No".
 

hazabaza1

Want Skyrim. Want. Do want.
Nov 26, 2008
9,612
0
0
You know, shooting him in the balls is always an option. Wouldn't kill him.
Just sayin'.
 

demoman_chaos

New member
May 25, 2009
2,254
0
0
I'd shoot him in each leg, hold him down while I slowly fillet the flesh off each of his fingers. Slowly cut his ears off, chunk by chunk. Then do the same to his tongue. Then I'd cut his dick off and shove it up his ass. Lastly, I'd cut his Achilles tendons and his triceps so he couldn't move. He'd lay there in a puddle of his own blood until he was dead.

The thousand innocents would be worth his suffering.
 

Anticitizen_Two

New member
Jan 18, 2010
1,371
0
0
Absolutely not. Well, I wouldn't kill him at least. I'd probably shoot him somewhere that would put him in extreme pain and incapacitate him so I could turn him in and send him off to prison (they would not treat him kindly there...). But kill him, and a thousand innocents with him, of course not.

Really good topic by the way.

demoman_chaos said:
I'd shoot him in each leg, hold him down while I slowly fillet the flesh off each of his fingers. Slowly cut his ears off, chunk by chunk. Then do the same to his tongue. Then I'd cut his dick off and shove it up his ass. Lastly, I'd cut his Achilles tendons and his triceps so he couldn't move. He'd lay there in a puddle of his own blood until he was dead.

The thousand innocents would be worth his suffering.
Note to self: never piss this guy off...
 

awesomeClaw

New member
Aug 17, 2009
1,831
0
0
No loopholes, guys. Let´s say if his pulse goes over the normal(either by pain or the stress of going to prison, everyone dies.
 

DaDrum

New member
May 9, 2010
35
0
0
beat the shit out of him, turn him in, then mourn the losses he has caused me while the media annoys me about 'how i did it'
 

Jandau

Smug Platypus
Dec 19, 2008
5,034
0
0
Of course not! Killing the 1k people just to get a bullet off would be just wrong. I let the bastard go and wait for a nicer time, when he hasn't got a bomb under his finger. I can always track the sonuvabitch later and take my time peeling his skin off and rubbing his flayed body with salt and acid.
 

Axeli

New member
Jun 16, 2004
1,064
0
0
awesomeClaw said:
No loopholes, guys. Let´s say if his pulse goes over the normal(either by pain or the stress of going to prison, everyone dies.
That makes no sense at all.

First of all, a hundred things would set off the bomb then. He'd only need to get excited, do something physical, etc. Also, all bombs can be defused. But let's go with the assumption that this one cannot be - which according to the "pulse goes too high" rule means that the bomb will go off anyway pretty soon.

That scenario just isn't logical. Here's one that works a bit better for your purposes:

The premise is the same as in your scenario, but... Before you got a gun and begun to pursue the guy, he had managed to poison you with something that kills you slowly but surely. He also leaves a controller to the bomb nearby, while fleeing the other way.
You now have two options, corner the guy (we assume that he's slowed by something, perhaps a wound in the leg, so you know you'll be able to catch him easily) or stay and defuse the bomb (which will be easy but take too long to make it possible to catch the guy afterwards).
And because you are going to die soon, this is the only chance you get to confront him. You are also the only one who knows what he did, meaning he'll get away free for sure if you don't stop him.
 

Rewdalf

Usually Sacrastic
Jan 6, 2010
769
0
0
Hah!
Killing him would be like letting him off the hook!
Torture is the way to go my friend.
Keep him so near death that he prays for it...