Poll: Large Hadron Collider

Recommended Videos

Lord Beautiful

New member
Aug 13, 2008
5,940
0
0
Yes, and I've been rather anxious to see if it gives us any promising results regarding the Higgs boson.
 

Kragg

New member
Mar 30, 2010
730
0
0
DEATHROAD said:
Ha..that made me laugh, 6 people dont know what it is, 300 do.

And i thought i was smart :(
you're assuming none of them quickly googled it :p
 

Kollega

New member
Jun 5, 2009
5,161
0
0
d3structor said:
And for those of you who didn't catch it, last week it collided particles for the first time at 7 TeV
They finally made it work, huh? LHC kinda fell off my radar after the first time they've tried to launch it (and damaged magnet cooling system).

Well, now i just hope the research actually yields some results.
 

oppp7

New member
Aug 29, 2009
7,045
0
0
Wilbot666 said:
oppp7 said:
Also, who cares about what happened at the Big Bang? That's similar to paleontology, AKA the useless biology subject.
Not really. By getting a clear snapshot of the "Big Bang" scientists hope to better understand the energies which must no-doubt run rampant in such an act of tumultuous "creation". It could teach our species fascinating things (from a physics point of view anyhow) about the way matter is formed, the way it bonds together and breaks apart, and also the forces that can both govern and change it.

Ever watched Star Trek and wished you had one of those damn replicator gizmos for when the beer runs out? Well this type of research is the most likely to someday lead to the possibility of that sort of technology.
And yes I realise that all this stuff (including the so-far theoretical Higg's-Boson molecule) is merely speculation at this point, but there's no harm in dreaming.
Haven't watched Star Trek, and as Cracked said, replicators would ruin society.

While it is good to get an idea of the Higgs-Boson stuff and other physics concepts, I'm not sure if any of it would be viable considering the size of the LHC and the energy it no doubt has. I mean, we probably could shrink it a little bit, but it will probably stay a huge size.
 

Dexiro

New member
Dec 23, 2009
2,977
0
0
I just hate it when people start whining about it creating black holes and destroying the universe.

The scientists said it had like a 0.0000000000001 percent chance of creating a black hole, and even in that scenario the black hole would be so small it'd collapse on itself in a millisecond.

The publics response: "OMG THERE'S 100% CHANCE IT'LL CREATE A BLACK HOLE AND DESTROY US ALL, WHY ARE SCIENTISTS TRYING TO KILL US?!"

That aside i'm excited to see what they find out from the collider, and with some luck we'll get a flying car or something from it in the long run ;)
 

Downfall89

New member
Aug 26, 2009
330
0
0
Thunderhorse94 said:
Yeah I know what it is partially. That massive machine scientists are using to smash particles together at extraordinarily fast speeds?
Correct. Nice dp.
 

Bobzer77

New member
May 14, 2008
717
0
0
grimsprice said:
The "carbon credit" bullshit planet wide moves enough money to build the international space station. annually.
Thats good to know, if things like the carbon credit "bullshit" doesn't work at least we'll be able to get a few people off a crippled dying earth....

OT I know = P
 

DividedUnity

New member
Oct 19, 2009
1,849
0
0
grimsprice said:
Marq said:
More like Large Money Sink Collider.

Seriously, if they don't find the Higg's Boson like they intended from the start, then all they have is a giant particle accelerator.
Do you realize that America alone spends 10 times the cost of the LHC on cigarettes. Yearly.

NASA receives less money annually than Americans spend on lip balm.

If the Coca Cola company stopped spending money on advertising they could build a Large Hadron Collider once every 2 years. (and lets be honest, Coca Cola does not need advertising)

The "carbon credit" bullshit planet wide moves enough money to build the international space station. annually.

The U.S. spent enough money on the B-2 "Spirit" Bomber, from inception to production, to fund NASA for 8 years.

Each Virginia class nuclear attack submarine (which serve precisely 0 purpose) is over 3 times the cost of both the Spirit and Opportunity rovers. Bots, rockets, launch, and ground crew for the entire duration of the mission.

The Gross Domestic Product of Luxembourg is enough to fund every space agency on the entire planet.

OPEC makes enough money to launch the space shuttle 3 times a day.... for a whole year.

Science is cheap compared to keeping 7 billion people alive, happy, and protected... from themselves.
Wow those are some interesting facts.

OT: I thought everyone knew about the Hadron Collider cause everyone was making jokes about the end of the world and being sucked into sqitzerland and such
 

Malkavian

New member
Jan 22, 2009
970
0
0
Marq said:
More like Large Money Sink Collider.

Seriously, if they don't find the Higg's Boson like they intended from the start, then all they have is a giant particle accelerator.
The Higgs Boson particle isn't really the intended goal. Rather, it is affirming or disproving a great number of theories, Higgs Boson amongst them.

If all turns out well, we'll have some theories that have existed for more than 50 years either affirmed or disproved, and we can finally establish some new working ground to take science further.
 

mikecoulter

Elite Member
Dec 27, 2008
3,389
5
43
I know quite a bit about it. I rather like to follow Physics, even if I did fail it at AS-Level, it's still amazingly interesting.
 

Ldude893

Elite Member
Apr 2, 2010
4,114
0
41
Dexiro said:
I just hate it when people start whining about it creating black holes and destroying the universe.

The scientists said it had like a 0.0000000000001 percent chance of creating a black hole, and even in that scenario the black hole would be so small it'd collapse on itself in a millisecond.

The publics response: "OMG THERE'S 100% CHANCE IT'LL CREATE A BLACK HOLE AND DESTROY US ALL, WHY ARE SCIENTISTS TRYING TO KILL US?!"

That aside i'm excited to see what they find out from the collider, and with some luck we'll get a flying car or something from it in the long run ;)
Or an Infinity Improbability Drive.
 

Mr. Mike

New member
Mar 24, 2010
532
0
0
Yes, I am aware of it and have a basic understanding of what it does and its purpose. One day I hope to fully comprehend every aspect of it (due to my love of physics). Watched the webcast of the collisions a week or two ago.
 

Snowalker

New member
Nov 8, 2008
1,937
0
0
SnootyEnglishman said:
Nope i have no what you are talking about because i don't pay attention to most things that don't directly affect me. Call me ignorant if you must but that's the way i am
Umm.. I wouldn't call ignorat, but this thing does a have a slight chance of affecting you... it could create a strangelet, and that would turn earth into a black hole. So, you might wanna check it out.

P.S. the chances one said strangelet actually being created, very, very, astronomically, slim.
 

DancePuppets

New member
Nov 9, 2009
197
0
0
I know what it is and I also know that its broken again. Coming from the UK I do wish that the research money had been put into physics that had a higher chance of producing good science at lower prices. But then I'm bitter doing Very High Energy Gamma Ray astronomy and all which the UK government has, in its infinite wisdom, decided not to fund the next generation of telescopes for, despite it releasing more papers per £ than many other, much better funded, subjects! Grrrr...
 

Dumbfish1

New member
Oct 17, 2008
523
0
0
If you don't know what it is : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider

Or if you're an idiot : http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider



Also, hilarious : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j50ZssEojtM