Ultra_Caboose said:
Also, I have to follow one simple rule, IF YOU HAVEN'T PLAYED IT, YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO JUDGE IT.
It's a very simple rule. Wait until you play it before you slam it with criticism and boycott threats. I haven't played it, so I have no stance on whether or not it will be good or bad. I'll rent it. If it's good, awesome. If it's not worth it, I'll move on to the next game.
The basis here is on track record.
Company X has produced License Game Y, and re-released it several times with new textures under License Z about 5 times. The games sell amazingly and get horrible reviews. The games are all buggy and get no support anywhere. They announce Game L. Will Game L be good...?
Sure, it's an overstatement. And L4D got okay reviews, but many of the people in the boycott group don't think it's that fun. They expected more, and didn't get it. The criticisms are actually mostly for the first game.
What somehow amazes me is the massive pointless "backlash" towards the boycott. People flame them and somehow try to "protest" the boycott. If you truly don't care, why are you paying attention to it? I fail to see any logic to the massive groups of people trying to protest other people not liking a game. If this were any other franchise, this would be a complete non-issue. Battlefield 2 got poor support, lags, and is unbalanced? Okay, don't get BF2142.
And suddenly...
WTF BOYCOTTERS DIE IN A FIRE BBQ JUST BUY IT.
Not many boycotters are really "whiners". We just hit the join button out of apathy for paying another $50, and then don't pay it much concern for a while and see what happens.
That said, I don't think the continuation of the boycott really means much, good or bad. Chances are, if Valve wasn't lying outright about their promise for continued support (which I think we all hope for) then the group will disband as soon as those promises are fulfilled. Many of the people in the group may even end up getting L4D2.