I could be wrong, but I think Mr. Dover may be referring to this: http://www.nytimes.com/1997/08/08/opinion/the-apple-of-microsoft-s-eye.htmlSupertegwyn said:Source or it's bullshit.Douglas Dover said:i like how Microsoft once bailed out apple to keep the competition alive.
OT: Stupid question (I mean really, a VS thread?), but it has to go to Microsoft.
At least they give money to charity.
they did so because apple was suing them... out of court solution and what not.Douglas Dover said:i like how Microsoft once bailed out apple to keep the competition alive.Zachary Amaranth said:Microsoft.
I have trouble buying that.Eclpsedragon said:If it's the choice over which is less "evil" I'd say Apple
I admit that I am bias as I've been screwed over by Microsoft more so than Apple, however I also own more Microsoft products, so chances of having to deal with Microsoft is higher in that case.Zachary Amaranth said:Microsoft.
I have trouble buying that.Eclpsedragon said:If it's the choice over which is less "evil" I'd say Apple
You are biased, you mean.Eclpsedragon said:I admit that I am bias as I've been screwed over by Microsoft more so than Apple, however I also own more Microsoft products, so chances of having to deal with Microsoft is higher in that case.