I was going to say that the DLC needs to be substantial, priced correctly, meaningful and clearly not cut content. But then I remember some good examples that don't fit. Dark Souls 1 had cut content DLC but was good. The initial run of Payday 2 DLC was not substantial but I think price fairly and even if you didn't pay but a friend did you could still play with them.
Poll: Microtransactions vs Paid DLC
- Thread starter Bob_McMillan
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I'm against DLC even when it is good I dont like it I feel like they left out something especially if they release a disc with all of the content in one single package. To me it is always more reason not to buy the game at launch. For example look at Mass Effect 3 it has so much content that I will probably never get to experience.
DLC is pretty much a dumb idea in the first place. True, you might make arguments about expansion packs, but there were those long before it was cool. Today's practice is a little more involved and usually dickish in nature.