Poll: Mirror's Edge; Fridge Logic

Recommended Videos

guchifaN7

New member
Feb 3, 2011
27
0
0
I've been spending a good deal of time on TV Tropes (which kinda explains the subject title) and came across the Mirror's Edge page. It mentioned in some places that runners were actually terrorists or otherwise aiding them (an idea proposed by yahtzee on this very site), while other places give mention to the fact that the Govt. made several non-conformist civilians "disappear", thus making the Govt. themselves terrorists. I want to know what the people of this forum have to say.
 

Laser Priest

A Magpie Among Crows
Mar 24, 2011
2,013
0
0
It's basically like the Bourne movie's storyline only more blatantly obvious with the villainous shit and much more annoying.
 

Aetera

New member
Jan 19, 2011
760
0
0
To put it in incredibly geeky terms, I kind of see it as chaotic neutral vs. lawful evil.
 

Taerdin

New member
Nov 7, 2006
977
0
0
Necromancer Jim said:
It's basically like the Bourne movie's storyline only more blatantly obvious with the villainous shit and much more annoying.
Wait... what?!?!

I always viewed the game as being against an unjust government, but I don't think the protagonist ever uses fear or violence against civilians or anything so I don't see how the runners are terrorists.
 

Valanthe

New member
Sep 24, 2009
654
0
0
I wouldn't put too much thought into the story of Mirror's Edge, I love the game to pieces but I'll be the first to admit that the plot has more holes than a block of swiss cheese.

To answer your question, I -think- you are supposed to be supporting some kind of underground resistance against a regime that has convinced the majority of its citizens to trade liberty for security.
 

Sniper Team 4

New member
Apr 28, 2010
5,433
0
0
Seeing as a politician framed a good cop for a murder, and what little backstory we're given, I'm saying that the government is closer to terrorist territory than the runners. Now granted, the runners actually ARE terrorists by definition, but I'm assuming you mean terrorist is the evil, bad, not-nice-we-kill-puppies kind of way.
 

oplinger

New member
Sep 2, 2010
1,721
0
0
Runner's aren't terrorists. Neither is the government. There's no terrorism involved. It's kinda like how the government try to regulate and control underground cultures. The runners are above the governments monitoring systems that are in place to watch the populace. Thus being a threat to control. That control causes them to try to root out the runners and create a project to train their forces in parkour.

It's not about terrorism, it's about control vs freedom.
 

moretimethansense

New member
Apr 10, 2008
1,617
0
0
Runners don't use violance or fear to get what they want, ergo not terrorists.
Pretty simple really, if anything they're more of a pirate postal service.
 

jawakiller

New member
Jan 14, 2011
776
0
0
guchifaN7 said:
while other places give mention to the fact that the Govt. made several non-conformist civilians "disappear", thus making the Govt. themselves terrorists.
All countries do that, it helps keep the peace. Even supposedly morally superior countries eliminate a bothersome civilian occasionally. Just because the government does something immoral doesn't make them a terrorist.
 

Dark Knifer

New member
May 12, 2009
4,468
0
0
moretimethansense said:
Runners don't use violance or fear to get what they want, ergo not terrorists.
Pretty simple really, if anything they're more of a pirate postal service.
Apart from the use of violence against guards and what not, though that could be self-defense. I hope all this get's explained at some point...
 

moretimethansense

New member
Apr 10, 2008
1,617
0
0
Dark Knifer said:
moretimethansense said:
Runners don't use violance or fear to get what they want, ergo not terrorists.
Pretty simple really, if anything they're more of a pirate postal service.
Apart from the use of violence against guards and what not, though that could be self-defense. I hope all this get's explained at some point...
Hey, I never said they were cut and clean innocents, but yeah, I'd have to call self defence on that one, they fired first with no chance to surrender.
Judging by what's his names reaction that's not a normal occourance.
 

Fenreil

New member
Mar 14, 2010
517
0
0
The runners are messengers, not terrorists. Aside from other sources, Jacknife specifically states that Project Icarus was designed to take out the messengers and disrupt the lines of communication. What the people they're delivering these messages to are doing, however, is never mentioned.

Some important things to note here is that most of the situation in the game is the current mayor's fault. Prior to him, police didn't give a shit about the runners. If you remember, in the beginning of the game, the characters are very confused as to why people are suddenly shooting at them. This is because those aren't policemen. They're members of the Private Security firm, Pirandello/Kruger, specifically sent to kill the runners. So, we can infer here that the runners were mostly harmless. This mayor is trying to crush all possible opposition, whatever it may be.

Also, well, the government isn't all that great. Here's something directly from TvTropes:
If You Can Read This: A naive Innocent Bystander is Tempting Fate when he types that he pities the Sinister Surveillance who has to monitor his porn surfing. He offhandedly wondered what they'd do if they learned he was quitting his job; tie him to a chair and beat him bloody? Guess what? That's exactly what they do!

Plus, there's that whole "November Riots" thing....
 

thefabulousvaati

New member
Mar 29, 2011
9
0
0
Due to lackluster writing, I really don't feel like the storyline explained itself thoroughly enough for me to even decide who was the real terrorist in this game. I can't say that anyone's motivations were really crystal clear. This game had so much potential too! It really wasn't as good as it could have been.
 

Ickorus

New member
Mar 9, 2009
2,887
0
0
Third option pretty much except I wouldn't call them terrorists really, more like an underground resistance.
 

DementedSheep

New member
Jan 8, 2010
2,654
0
0
They are not trying to cause terror so they aren?t terrorist. They aren?t even that much of a resistance group and they don?t even seem to be going after the government or pushing for change. They are just run illegal messages. Do they get paid for it? Likely many of those messages are for the more hard core resistance groups tho they were never really brought up much and they may or may not be terrorists. From how I interpreted what jacknife said they are going after the runners to break communications between other groups and stop people being able to send private messages and spread unfilterd news around to each without being monitored. The runners themselves are not much of a threat or the main concern. They are just the messangers. Perhaps other resistance groups will be more involved in ME2? (assuming they actually make it)
Ickorus said:
Third option pretty much except I wouldn't call them terrorists really, more like an underground resistance.
GAAHHH WTF...oh wait thats just your profile pic. *thought the bug was real*