I voted dogs. And I know it's already been said but I feel it needs rehashing, after getting a bunch of kills you should not be given options to make it easier to get even more kills, it should get progressively harder not easier.
Poll: Most Annoying Thing About COD WAW Online???
- Thread starter Reg5879
- Start date
Recommended Videos
MP40 sniping is downright awful. In CoD4 it was almost unheard of to snipe somebody with an MP5, but it happens all the time in W@W.
Glitchers are bad, but apparently a lot of them have been fixed. I haven't seen anyone do the Roundhouse glitch in ages, much less the Castle glitch.
And surprisingly enough, for a FPS, there are very few teabaggers.
Glitchers are bad, but apparently a lot of them have been fixed. I haven't seen anyone do the Roundhouse glitch in ages, much less the Castle glitch.
And surprisingly enough, for a FPS, there are very few teabaggers.
I mostly play hardcore.
Martyrdom is rarely a problem because most morons who actually use it in hardcore get kicked before they get a chance to kill me with it. Juggernaut is as useless as stopping power. So I may have to hit you with one more bullet if I'm shooting you through a wall with a weak gun. Dogs are brutal, but they can actually die from bullets (as opposed to everything else in regular) and go down easily... most of the time >_>.
Vehicles... They are bad in regular, and worse in hardcore. It's nearly impossible to destroy an enemy tank if one of the enemies on foot is covering it properly. It's annoying, but it's realistic.
Last Stand...
Fuck Last Stand... It is the most bullshit perk in the game and it doesn't even make sense. First off... Why the hell should a soldier be able to do anything besides lose control of his bowels after being shot multiple times in the chest? Okay... You're right. It's a game. It doesn't have to be realistic. How about then, that split second of invulnerability while said soldier is going into last stand? It's a damn joke that I should have to stop shooting to wait for the fucker to finish falling and aiming his gun at me before my bullets become effective. This is the most annoying, because everybody fucking uses it in hardcore, and if you don't manage to kill them, they get revived and its as if your "kill" never existed.
Martyrdom is rarely a problem because most morons who actually use it in hardcore get kicked before they get a chance to kill me with it. Juggernaut is as useless as stopping power. So I may have to hit you with one more bullet if I'm shooting you through a wall with a weak gun. Dogs are brutal, but they can actually die from bullets (as opposed to everything else in regular) and go down easily... most of the time >_>.
Vehicles... They are bad in regular, and worse in hardcore. It's nearly impossible to destroy an enemy tank if one of the enemies on foot is covering it properly. It's annoying, but it's realistic.
Last Stand...
Fuck Last Stand... It is the most bullshit perk in the game and it doesn't even make sense. First off... Why the hell should a soldier be able to do anything besides lose control of his bowels after being shot multiple times in the chest? Okay... You're right. It's a game. It doesn't have to be realistic. How about then, that split second of invulnerability while said soldier is going into last stand? It's a damn joke that I should have to stop shooting to wait for the fucker to finish falling and aiming his gun at me before my bullets become effective. This is the most annoying, because everybody fucking uses it in hardcore, and if you don't manage to kill them, they get revived and its as if your "kill" never existed.
Why the fuck are there red dots.... oh excuse me black dots?(see now people wont make the connection If we change the color!!!) on fucking WII guns???
I would really like to know.
yeah I hate Cod:Waw
CoD4 > Cod:WaW...at least for me.
I would really like to know.
yeah I hate Cod:Waw
CoD4 > Cod:WaW...at least for me.
That too. I tend to hate games more if there previous were better. I mean, how the fuck could you water down the winning formula???Flap Jack452 said:
I think this game is the proverbial nail in the coffin for WW2 games. Or at least I hope so... God I hope so...BLOONINJA 503 said:
One can hope...Flap Jack452 said:
This just in Gearbox wants money!!!
Brother in Arms:Nazi clusterfuck has been announced!!! :]
Martyrdom gets my vote. Everyting else in the game rewards player involvement - Martyrdom is just there for a radom free kill. It was especially annoying when I first started playing COD4 as EVERYONE was using the damn thing and it took me a few hours to pick up on the signs when someone had the perk. Now, I'm just annoyed that it slows the pace of the game. You do a lot of rushing about, then you get a kill, then you wait for a few seconds to make sure you didn't miss the sound of a grenade dropping in the gunfire, then you carry on.
Just another reason WaW is just a bad clone of COD4 in a WW2 costume. Attachments make sense in a modern setting, but because Activision insisted on making the same game in a different era they carried the exact same gameplay (more or less) over, where it just doesn't belong.scoobyduped said:
In most cases I'd go with Martydom, but I've recently suffered at the hands of a prick doing the "Get 7 kills, Dogs, Die, Get 7 kills because of Dogs, Dogs, Die, repeat" situation.
But it should be said if you dislike Martydom, play hardcore, the grenade spam idiots get rather well ass kicked there.
But it should be said if you dislike Martydom, play hardcore, the grenade spam idiots get rather well ass kicked there.
IMO Battlefield Bad Company is the ONLY FPS that has done vehicles well for consoles....DeathSnipa1992 said:
I dont really know why people didn't buy it.(its done well enough for a sequel, so Im happy but I think the game deserved better sales.)