Poll: Movies "based on true events" and artistic liberties/laziness

Recommended Videos

Pseudonym2

New member
Mar 31, 2008
1,086
0
0
SODAssault said:
I voted "Sometimes". It can either help to drive a point home and make a movie more powerful, or it can make you snort derisively the second you finish watching the commercial.

Blackhawk Down?
The odd thing about Black Hawk down is that one of the main characters was a child rapist. Funny how the pentagon asked for that character to be changed into a guy named John Grimes.
 

Klagermeister

New member
Jun 13, 2008
719
0
0
Taken was based off of a true current event, so that was pretty cool.
So was Band of brothers.
But sometimes they just make it too accurate and familiar, like Flight 93.

So I went with "Sometimes".
 

roman gnome

New member
Feb 1, 2009
50
0
0
I have often wondered if Shakespeare used that phrase to advertise "Macbeth."
Witches! Ghosts! Scotsmen! Based on a true story!
 

bluegriffin8

New member
Apr 14, 2009
57
0
0
to be quite honest, whenever i see that a movie is 'based on true events,' i am left with one of two feelings:
feeling a) is this going to be 'based off of true events' like the movie fargo was, or
feeling b) that whoever made the movie just took whatever the liked, and made up the rest.

(yes, i know i'm being grumpy. so sue me.)
 

Sanaj

New member
Mar 20, 2009
322
0
0
bluegriffin8 said:
to be quite honest, whenever i see that a movie is 'based on true events,' i am left with one of two feelings:
feeling a) is this going to be 'based off of true events' like the movie fargo was, or
feeling b) that whoever made the movie just took whatever the liked, and made up the rest.

(yes, i know i'm being grumpy. so sue me.)
Unfortunately, feeling B proves to be more frequently to be the rule, not the exception.

So no, usually I take the "based on true events" or "based on a true story" spiel with mountainous piles of salt.

Just because a movie is "based off a true story" doesn't necessarily mean it's going to result in a better film.
 

cleverlymadeup

New member
Mar 7, 2008
5,256
0
0
Darth Mobius said:
Movies like "The Bank Job" and such, Yes, very much, Anything in the Horror genre, HELL NO.
some of the best horror movies of all time have been based on real stuff, such as The Texas Chainsaw Massacre

JMeganSnow said:
"Based on true events" or "Ripped from the headlines" just means "the writer is unimaginative and/or horribly shallow". Bleh.

If you want to see the difference in action, look at the recent James Bond movies: Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace. Casino Royale, was a MUCH, MUCH better movie, even though the events were a little contrived (A super-high stakes international national security poker game? REALLY?!) because it was internally consistent due to sticking with the strictly artistic element. Quantum of Solace sucked--the plot wasn't just contrived, it was STUPID. You know why? They attempted to base it around something that really did happen when Bolivia went about "privatizing" their water delivery infrastructure in a criminally stupid way. All the international flair, mystique, and suave that makes James Bond, well, James Bond, were completely lost in a sordid little two-bit scam that could only have been dreamed up by someone completely ignorant of basic economics.

No. Even if the artist is an idiot, at least when they avoid things that "really happened" they still might pull off a semi-competent story.
oh but James Bond is based on a real person tho, he was a man know as Intrepid [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Stephenson] so i guess there goes that little theory, cause since James Bond is based on a real person, it must now suck :)
 

Galletea

Inexplicably Awesome
Sep 27, 2008
2,877
0
0
As I've said before, films need to be taken as works on their own right regardless of influences, it's harder to be disappointed for one thing. Saying "based on a true story" is more a disclaimer than a hook for me, in case of similarities to other events.
 

Erana

New member
Feb 28, 2008
8,010
0
0
Murder on the Third was a good movie that was pretty much completely different from the actual events.
The thing is, they should have not said, "Based on a true story." They should have just rolled with it. Like in Clock Tower 3, some of the murderers were based loosely on real murderers, but they didn't go flaunting that around.
 

ace_of_something

New member
Sep 19, 2008
5,995
0
0
It doesn't really effect me either way. At the end of the movie I might say "I wonder how much of that is bunk?"

My fiance on the other hand wants to see every movie that is 'based on a true story' except horror films
 

JMeganSnow

New member
Aug 27, 2008
1,591
0
0
cleverlymadeup said:
oh but James Bond is based on a real person tho, he was a man know as Intrepid [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Stephenson] so i guess there goes that little theory, cause since James Bond is based on a real person, it must now suck :)
All characters are based (loosely or not) on real people. It's when the plot is based on "real events" that it sucks.
 

Aardvark Soup

New member
Jul 22, 2008
1,058
0
0
Considering even movies based on the Amnityville Horror hoax (or any other horror movie that involves ghosts) claim to be based on true events I tend to be skeptic when films say that.