Games and films are compared often--too often, I admit, but I ask your indulgence for the sake of discussion.
Both industries have their triple-A blockbusters, and happily enough, each medium is seeing increased attention paid to indie darlings. And obviously they each have more than their share of bombs, as well; from overblown high-profile clusterfucks to simple box office flops to obscure low-budget stinkers. However, when it comes to some bad or failed movies--usually from that latter category--they sort of unofficially get passed down into their own little subgenre: "B" movies, where a whole new subset of fans, genre nerds and cinephiles will watch and enjoy them, however ironically.
With games it's different though; when they're bad, they're bad. They are to be avoided in stores and ridiculed on the web.
I find this unfair. I say that there is room in gaming society for a "B" Games genre!
Now obviously I'm not asking for a complete re-assessment of every bad game ever produced, but maybe some games deserve more than the out-and-out dismissal the community at large bestows upon them.
The difference between a "B" game and a regular old bad game are naturally going to be subjective. But usually it's going to be the game that in spite of all its flaws either tried something innovative and worthy of acknowledgement, or somehow managed to still be entertaining or hold your attention.
Any recent releases or classics you can think of that qualify for "B" status?
Both industries have their triple-A blockbusters, and happily enough, each medium is seeing increased attention paid to indie darlings. And obviously they each have more than their share of bombs, as well; from overblown high-profile clusterfucks to simple box office flops to obscure low-budget stinkers. However, when it comes to some bad or failed movies--usually from that latter category--they sort of unofficially get passed down into their own little subgenre: "B" movies, where a whole new subset of fans, genre nerds and cinephiles will watch and enjoy them, however ironically.
With games it's different though; when they're bad, they're bad. They are to be avoided in stores and ridiculed on the web.
I find this unfair. I say that there is room in gaming society for a "B" Games genre!
Now obviously I'm not asking for a complete re-assessment of every bad game ever produced, but maybe some games deserve more than the out-and-out dismissal the community at large bestows upon them.
The difference between a "B" game and a regular old bad game are naturally going to be subjective. But usually it's going to be the game that in spite of all its flaws either tried something innovative and worthy of acknowledgement, or somehow managed to still be entertaining or hold your attention.
Any recent releases or classics you can think of that qualify for "B" status?