Poll: Now that's something I havn't seen 50 times before...
- Thread starter jonza1
- Start date
Recommended Videos
they are not really "sequals" as in they don't continue a certain story. they all all different in terms of the plot, although most of them are pretty unoriginal/bland.webbo619 said:if the sequal can pull it off then hurayyy for them
but i think ones like FFXIII are just not necessary, 13 sequals is WAY too much.
It's because nobody can think of any original ideas seirously practically every sensible game idea has been used already and even some insane ones like LBP. The point is that its hard to make a new game and sequels sell better even if they turn out to be rubbish
Time for a quick editHeadshot Gamer UK said:Well at least you destroyed your own point yourself thereBen Legend said:
As a gamer I want new games that break new ground. However, I'm torn because the game I'm most excited about is COD6 so it's not like I won't buy stuff that's been out before. Heck, the other game I'm interested in is L4D2 and it's a sequel.
It's hard to get excited about stuff I've never seen before.
It's hard to get excited about stuff I've never seen before.
i hate film sequels because they're nearly always a lazier, lower-budget film than the first. also the story has to become more fantastic to out-do it's predecessor and the whole thing winds up in a turgid mess.
with games i am still skeptical, but much more lenient. i'm always gunning for new, original, evocative, thought-provoking and engaging games but i don't mind sequels. most games are capable of having excellent sequels, and because the storyline and the script was never very good in the first one, the pressure is off to maintain the standard. then there's the money that's usually pumped into sequels. in fact in gaming, sequels very often surpass their predecessors.
besides, i'd like to see the difference in the amount of gaming sequels this year from the amount last year. and the year before and so on.
with games i am still skeptical, but much more lenient. i'm always gunning for new, original, evocative, thought-provoking and engaging games but i don't mind sequels. most games are capable of having excellent sequels, and because the storyline and the script was never very good in the first one, the pressure is off to maintain the standard. then there's the money that's usually pumped into sequels. in fact in gaming, sequels very often surpass their predecessors.
besides, i'd like to see the difference in the amount of gaming sequels this year from the amount last year. and the year before and so on.
As long as it's a good game, I don't care if it's a sequel.
But then again, you forgot: Prototype, Alan Wake, The Saboteur, The Conduit, and lots of other games.
But then again, you forgot: Prototype, Alan Wake, The Saboteur, The Conduit, and lots of other games.
I wouldn't say that there are too many sequels, I'd just say that there are a lot because of the demand for them.
But as long as the sequel doesn't suck, I'm fine with it.
But as long as the sequel doesn't suck, I'm fine with it.
Up until a couple of days ago i would be the first jump and cry "Why are there no new game ideas" but i played zeno clash, so all i can do now in contradict myself
It's not just video games, holywood is making just the same amount of effort to try pushing their latest sequels on us, but yeah, from what ive heard the worst game developers for sequels that are upcoming soon is Kojima and Square Enix.
another good example would be the metal gear solid franchaise, it's bad enough they put it on the ipod touch, now they're bringing yet another one out to play as Raiden again -_-.Judgedread said:
