Source:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/ohio-mom-jailed-sending-kids-school-district/story?id=12763654
Is the mom justified in doing this? What she did seems unquestionably illegal, but at the same time, she had a responsibility to give her kids the best quality of living that they could get, and education is a vital aspect in that regard. On the other hand, if people who don't abide by the law don't get punished, then real criminals will be able to manipulate the system more easily. There's no definite answer.
Here's a few arguments from both sides. Feel free to add your own in the comments below.
She was justified:
-She had a responsibility to her childrens' education
-Her kids should not have been denied a better education simply because of where they lived
-If she really had equal opportunity, one school district would not receive priority to another.
She wasn't justified:
-What she did was illegal. If you want this type of thing to change, advocate the changing of the law itself.
-Residents of the other better district paid higher taxes and consequently received a better education. The mom paid less taxes and still got her kids a better education, which is unfair.
So what do you think? Is the mom justified in what she did?
http://abcnews.go.com/US/ohio-mom-jailed-sending-kids-school-district/story?id=12763654
Is the mom justified in doing this? What she did seems unquestionably illegal, but at the same time, she had a responsibility to give her kids the best quality of living that they could get, and education is a vital aspect in that regard. On the other hand, if people who don't abide by the law don't get punished, then real criminals will be able to manipulate the system more easily. There's no definite answer.
Here's a few arguments from both sides. Feel free to add your own in the comments below.
She was justified:
-She had a responsibility to her childrens' education
-Her kids should not have been denied a better education simply because of where they lived
-If she really had equal opportunity, one school district would not receive priority to another.
She wasn't justified:
-What she did was illegal. If you want this type of thing to change, advocate the changing of the law itself.
-Residents of the other better district paid higher taxes and consequently received a better education. The mom paid less taxes and still got her kids a better education, which is unfair.
So what do you think? Is the mom justified in what she did?