English is considered a Germanic language. It does however have quite a bit of romantic (French) in it though.Jester00 said:one "world language" would be very cool.
i'm german, but english sounds way cooler and isn't hard to learn, so i think english would be a great world language.
Someone's probably already pointed this out but, if not: you're probably thinking of the Chinese word for "crisis". It is a commonly held incorrect belief that the hanzi making up that word are the chinese words for "danger" (wei) and "opportunity" (ji). And while "wei" does translate as "danger", "ji" actually translates to something like "critical moment" rather than "opportunity".Cypher10110 said:language is a fascinating topic. talking to someone is basically poetry, in that you are trying to convey meaning using words, a conversation is the most basic example, lyrics and poetry are more complex and "rich" examples.
The language you use will change the options of expression open to you. I personally find eastern languages particularly interesting (as they have their roots far from Latin based languages), as they have no just different words, but different concepts.
Only bits I remember from memory is stuff like opportunity and problem are the same word in Japanese (I think it's Japanese), because they see them as the same thing, and when you think about it, they basically are. A problem can have numerous different solutions, so "opportunity" makes sense.
I don't think language will ever be united in 1 language, I think the capacity for us to become multilingual, and mix languages is more likely.
tkioz said:Yeah... in 1885...Orcus_35 said:Those who said French 0.9% are correct, French is the Language of the Diplomats.
most of the diplomatic missions around the world speak french nowadays, why is that ?the european union has most of it's stuff in belgium and france. they talk french in both countrys.
English has an enormous amount of Latin influence. It's hard not to notice it. After all, you're in a FORUM.Akalabeth said:RAMBO22 said:Yeah, just like it's irrelevant that today the "Western" culture we embrace is based off of classical Greece and Rome (sarcasm)...English is a mix of Norman French and Old English, which is itself derived from Germanic. So since both German and English are derived from some ancient Germanic should we start speaking it too???Bruin said:Latin is a dead language in the sense that no major populace speaks it.
However, if people spoke it, it wouldn't be a dead language.
Because people would be speaking it.
Do you see how this works?
Much of the grammar is the same, many of the words are cognates, and Latin is something people in many countries study. Countries outside of where Latin originated. It's used for so many things these days we all practically know Latin in some form or another.
Therefore, it's not irrelevant.
Mandarin isn't derived from Latin
Neither is Russian or anything Germanic.
Only Spanish, Italian, French, Romanian and a few others.
Besides, you're talking about destroying people's cultures. Because that's what it is. Culture is heavily dependant on Language, if you started Latin immersion schools across the globe, you're basically going to destroy everyone's culture in two generation.
No one is going to stand for that.
And why should Asian people learn Latin? Why should Russian? Their language has nothing in common with Latin.
If there is one world language, the move towards that language will be both natural and gradual. Not the resurrection of a dead language that has no contemporary relevance.
No, i'm american and english is way boring, and hard! I've had to take honors enghlish for years. So many effing rules!!!Jester00 said:one "world language" would be very cool.
i'm german, but english sounds way cooler and isn't hard to learn, so i think english would be a great world language.