True. But... Fuck it. Not doing it feels to me like showing sympathy for Hitler. I think this goes deeper than just 'double-standards,' this guy has literally devoted his life to ruining everyone else's lives. If there is ever a time when sinking to somebody's level is appropriate, this would be it.holy_secret said:So you're saying it's okay because you don't agree with his life views?someonehairy-ish said:There's a difference between picketing the funeral of a soldier or black person or a gay person and picketing the funeral of an evil hateful nazi bastard who will be going to hell anyway.holy_secret said:It's about the fact that we are against picketing funerals, because they're sacred and incredibly sensitive.
Why would you want to do something you despise and are against?
Makes no sense to me.
That's how I see it anyway.
That means he's right in doing it too. He does not agree with the life views of homosexuals, soldiers and so on.
Why should your opinion be more important than his?
Don't forget that it's this mentality that makes him act like he does. He justifies it by saying it's wrong and god hates it. Just because I agree with you (that he's a fucking awful human being), doesn't mean I can turn a blind eye to this horrible display of double standard.
Its not about teaching them the error of their ways, its about not about stooping to their level, its about that fact that your saying X is a dick because he did Y and then saying I'm going to do Y and I'm not a dick because I'm special. No. If you do the kind of stupid things the WBC does, for whatever reason, you are being like them and that's not acceptable. It's clear to me that they aren't going to change. Being mean and doing annoying things to them is not only going to fuel their trolling but also make them more obstinate. The correct action is to do what the right thing is and ignore these trolls as the attention whores they are.Doclector said:Here's the thing though. We're working with people who seem to have no actual sense of empathy. They don't know or don't care how the families of those who they do this to feel, which if true actually makes them psychopaths, but we'll leave the discussion of just how crazy WBC is for later.Twilight_guy said:No. You don't protests the actions of a group by doing doing exactly what they did in revenge, that's just perpetuating the thing you hate. You fight these actions by being the bigger man (metaphorically) and choosing not to preform these actions in an act of revenge.
IN this way, we know being nice to them doesn't work. We know taking the high ground has no effect on them whatsoever.
Want proof? Watch Louis Theroux's documentaries on them. As usual, Theroux attempted to get competely unbiased look at his subjects, indeed, he may be the only man who has ever attempted to bring their side of the story to mainstream media, and they hated him for it. He's now actually commonly mentioned by them as the devil.
I'm not saying it's necessarily morally right to picket this man's funeral, yes, it goes down to their level, but at least this way, there is a small chance that some of them may finally see what they do to others, whereas the high road is clearly achieving nothing in this case.
But we've tried ignoring them. We haven't tried to do exactly the same things they do to others. Again, I ain't questioning that it's childish, and sinks to their level, but we can't say sinking to their level doesn't work until we've actually tried.Twilight_guy said:Its not about teaching them the error of their ways, its about not about stooping to their level, its about that fact that your saying X is a dick because he did Y and then saying I'm going to do Y and I'm not a dick because I'm special. No. If you do the kind of stupid things the WBC does, for whatever reason, you are being like them and that's not acceptable. It's clear to me that they aren't going to change. Being mean and doing annoying things to them is not only going to fuel their trolling but also make them more obstinate. The correct action is to do what the right thing is and ignore these trolls as the attention whores they are.Doclector said:Here's the thing though. We're working with people who seem to have no actual sense of empathy. They don't know or don't care how the families of those who they do this to feel, which if true actually makes them psychopaths, but we'll leave the discussion of just how crazy WBC is for later.Twilight_guy said:No. You don't protests the actions of a group by doing doing exactly what they did in revenge, that's just perpetuating the thing you hate. You fight these actions by being the bigger man (metaphorically) and choosing not to preform these actions in an act of revenge.
IN this way, we know being nice to them doesn't work. We know taking the high ground has no effect on them whatsoever.
Want proof? Watch Louis Theroux's documentaries on them. As usual, Theroux attempted to get competely unbiased look at his subjects, indeed, he may be the only man who has ever attempted to bring their side of the story to mainstream media, and they hated him for it. He's now actually commonly mentioned by them as the devil.
I'm not saying it's necessarily morally right to picket this man's funeral, yes, it goes down to their level, but at least this way, there is a small chance that some of them may finally see what they do to others, whereas the high road is clearly achieving nothing in this case.
In my mind, it has nothing to do with whether or not someone deserves the treatment. I just believe that if you picket at a funeral, you're being a dick. Phelps is a dick, granted, but why should I let someone else's twisted morality mess with my own.BlindedHunter said:Well for that argument I just don't really see it.Varitel said:The concern is not so much sinking down to their level as it is that picketing a funeral is in poor taste as I said aboveBlindedHunter said:I'm undecided on this, but I think the people worrying about stooping to their level are being a little bit silly. Picketing his funeral would not make someone as bad as they are. It might make you a bit less desirable a person, but you aren't picketing the funeral of someone who died fighting for any sort of good, or rallying against other people's private sexual views. You just want some damned justice in the world.
Would I do it? Well, if I wasn't lazy, I would definitely consider it. I feel like they deserve far, far worse after all.
Yes, picketing funerals tends to be in poor taste. That is a time of mourning that is very important to people.
But when you have spent years and years doing that to people who have had to deal with the difficulties of being a military family just so you can tell another group of people that tends to have a very tough time getting by socially in this world that god hates them? You've given up the right.
when your brain and heart are at odds, let your penis decidejessegeek said:The head said "No, as us rational humans should do everything to set an example and not lower ourselves to the level of the likes of him."
The heart did a spittake and said "Phwa ha ha ha up his! Hells yeah, that stupid old git deserves a taste of his own medicine."
I know that doesn't look like a moral choice, but for a long time I genuinely couldn't decide. Usually I'm all for the rise above point of view, but... man, that would be some sweet poetic justice.
For me the only way to resolve this is to imagine myself picketing his funeral, and I have to say I'm immediately uncomfortable with that idea. Irrespective of what he and his family did, it would still be the swan song of a human life, and despite his abhorrent views, it just feels wrong to ruin what is an important ceremony for some people. (This coming from a bisexual atheist.)