VanQ said:
Frankly put, people on the internet are likely to be highly sensitive to anything involving the following:
-Women
-Children
-Things they don't like that somebody else likes
When it comes to children, it's not just the internet. My girlfriend's father is an artist. He was sketching in the park, and someone called the cops because there were children playing nearby, and the assumption was that he was sketching them in a...fuck I don't know...sinister fashion? People are CRAZED about protecting children. Particularly their own children. It is an a-priori biological compulsion. I'm not even sure they can help it.
On the subject of the video, I'll play Devil's Advocate for a moment. They're NOT rough-housing. They're dancing. And they're not playtime dancing, it's an emotionally charged, somewhat sensual exchange. Which makes sense, given the context of the song and what the scene is an allegory for. So they're not behaving in a typical adult/child fashion. I'm not remotely surprised that there was outcry...not because "people are stupid", necessarily, but because if you put a child in a flesh colored leotard and a scruffy looking, emotionally unstable man in close proximity and have them touching one another in anything remotely resembling an intimate fashion, there are people who are going to lose their fucking minds.
I remember getting in an argument once with someone who claimed "Mad Men" was the most sexist show on television, because it showed period-appropriate sexism without any filter. There are people who only really do well thinking in straight lines. That the dance and their interaction could be an artistic representation of something else entirely never really registers. It's just a little girl and a grubby man, and they're extremely unhappy about it.