Assassin Xaero said:
vivaldiscool said:
If the scientists say it's not a planet, then it's not a planet. It's not like this is a subjective thing.
Didn't scientist also say that there was going to be an ice age in the 70's and say that there is global warming now? And, shortly after they said Pluto wasn't a planet, they declared some big ball of gas in another solar system a planet...
kaziard said:
vivaldiscool said:
If the scientists say it's not a planet, then it's not a planet. It's not like this is a subjective thing.
they also said man cant fly, the victorians had discovered everything possible and the world is round (which it clearly isnt)
just saying "the scientists" arnt always right
As Good as it is to have a questioning mind, there comes a time when you have to realize that such things must be questioned for logical fallices, not what suites your fancy. This is quite obviously an entirely different case than the afformentioned examples. For one, This isn't an example of discovery or prediction, it's a simple matter of reclassification. Is it valuable? Yes. But it can't be "wrong" per-se since the only changed that faulty paremeters of what makes a planet, rather than what pluto was thought to be.
For another. Do I really have to spell out how stupid it is to say "They
could say it's wrong in the future, so I'm going to stick with what they know is wrong now."?