As far as I'm aware the only religion that requires circumcision is Judaism. Which is explicitly not a Christian religion. It's an Abrahamic religion.BlindTom said:So you don't think it is a result of western religions targeting men's genitals and forcing them to internalise and accept their abuses whilst finding the similar practices of non christian religions abhorrent?Lilani said:This is true. If I've got my facts straight, circumcision for men is really only a health benefit if anything. But circumcision for women can be very detrimental and unsafe.Serris said:for men, circumsision is a matter of hygiene: it's not necessary, but it's more hygienic.
for women, there is zero advantage to being circumcised, and in fact poses many health risks during the operation.
i would die before i let anyone touch my daughter with a knife in that place for no good reason whatsoever.
It's not just a coincidence that there are more groups against female circumcision then there are against male circumcision.
But I can understand that you feel somewhat attacked.
When I read your topic I was taken aback, circumcision is really looked down upon in Australia (unless there's a population that I was unaware of who have a different view), even in school we were taught about female circumcision but it was called genital mutilation. I understand that they are two different processes but many wouldn't see the distinction.
Also, I wouldn't circumcise any child unless it was a medical necessity, not just girls.