How is she supposed to make arrangement for childcare before working for the army when in fact she got that baby 3 years after recruitment?Plurralbles said:Erana said:Society today fails hard at making it possible for women to be mothers while maintaining any sort of career. I don't think this woman went about this the right way, but is it really so bad to expect that a place of employment could provide childcare?
I dont' know, is it too much to expect someone to come up with asking for the arrangement before they start working for the army? You know, like NORMAL people in civilian jobs?
Do we even have to tell you how you just destroyed your own argument? Do we? Really?Bodyless said:How is she supposed to make arrangement for childcare before working for the army when in fact she got that baby 3 years after recruitment?Plurralbles said:Erana said:Society today fails hard at making it possible for women to be mothers while maintaining any sort of career. I don't think this woman went about this the right way, but is it really so bad to expect that a place of employment could provide childcare?
I dont' know, is it too much to expect someone to come up with asking for the arrangement before they start working for the army? You know, like NORMAL people in civilian jobs?
ToBodyless said:How is she supposed to make arrangement for childcare before working for the army when in fact she got that baby 3 years after recruitment?Plurralbles said:Erana said:Society today fails hard at making it possible for women to be mothers while maintaining any sort of career. I don't think this woman went about this the right way, but is it really so bad to expect that a place of employment could provide childcare?
I dont' know, is it too much to expect someone to come up with asking for the arrangement before they start working for the army? You know, like NORMAL people in civilian jobs?
Normal people, when negotiating a job, ask about benefits and what the company does for things like maternity leave and sickness. She is female. She should have known that she will have a child or not, so that's no big surprise otu of the blue. No one cries, "Something fell out of my vagina, I'm so surprised! No way to predict that!"Lullabye said:Do we even have to tell you how you just destroyed your own argument? Do we? Really?Bodyless said:How is she supposed to make arrangement for childcare before working for the army when in fact she got that baby 3 years after recruitment?Plurralbles said:Erana said:Society today fails hard at making it possible for women to be mothers while maintaining any sort of career. I don't think this woman went about this the right way, but is it really so bad to expect that a place of employment could provide childcare?
I dont' know, is it too much to expect someone to come up with asking for the arrangement before they start working for the army? You know, like NORMAL people in civilian jobs?
Um, I don't think she should have won. But I'm anti "kill people" generally and as such I feel the military is something fundamentally flawed and wrong so this evens out to a collective "meh"./just my opinion
In the end, what's done is done.
The moral of the story is: Single mothers are more powerful than the military?
agreed. she got pregnant and last time i checked, you have 9 months to organise stuff before its to late. why should someone get a free ticket into a country without a proper reason? and just because somebody asked for them to come?ShatteredBlack said:A flat-out no.
My answer would be different if the Armed forces had employed her knowing she had a child and then refused to care for it.
However, they employed her and one of the requirements of her employment was that she be avaliable for duty at any time. That she then (willingly?) fell pregnant, rendering her unable to fulfill that clause, constitues, in my mind anyway, a breach of contract.
- [Army employs person] + [Person breaches contract] = [Person fired from Army]
That she then successfully sues her employer for her choice to breach her contract is preposterous.
Her race and gender have nothing to do with it - You cannot sues someone else for a choice you made.
...hang on, what? Why does the British army have a say over whether or not her sister's allowed to immigrate?Miss DeBique also won a claim of race discrimination because Army chiefs did not let her bring her half-sister from the Caribbean to look after the child.
Hmm...I suppose you could...sue mefoodmaniac said:*gasp* You stole my idea!TheSquirrelisKing said:Seriously, maybe I should join the army. Then I can sue them later to make them solve all my problems.
No, because the MoD is one of the few employers that can point blank sack you for getting pregnant. I'm not surprised she won, people always side with the percieved victim. But hey, greed is good.Sharkie668 said:So my question to you guys is, do you think that she was right in suing the MoD?
I can't stand lawyers.The_Healer said:Don't blame her, she was just an innocent bystander.
It was the Lawyer, clever bastard.
Exactly. They can't afford to waste the 6 figure sum that she wants on her, they need that for winning the war in Afghanistan.KillerMidget said:I think they're a bit busy, y'know, fighting a war.
They should counter-sue against her for endangering the lives of other soldiers by taking MoD money.Sharkie668 said:Exactly. They can't afford to waste the 6 figure sum that she wants on her, they need that for winning the war in Afghanistan.KillerMidget said:I think they're a bit busy, y'know, fighting a war.
They actually should.KillerMidget said:They should counter-sue against her for endangering the lives of other soldiers by taking MoD money.Sharkie668 said:Exactly. They can't afford to waste the 6 figure sum that she wants on her, they need that for winning the war in Afghanistan.KillerMidget said:I think they're a bit busy, y'know, fighting a war.