To be honest I get most, if not all, my PC games through Digital Distribution. There's no reason to pre-order something unless you're 100% sure you want it. They're not going to run out.
You can't realistically expect them to give all DLC for free since they don't exactly have every DLC planned out before the game is released, and if they do, that means they really are money grubbing assholes. The main thing to worry about is DLC that is released in first couple weeks of the games release. Those DLCs are definitely the ones that were going to be on the disc, but got cut so they could prevent the release date from being pushed back. If they charge you for that, then that's bullshit. But luckily for us, the $10 plan that EA has come up with keeps that DLC "free" for the people that buy it new.zfactor said:Magicman10893 said:That is what they have been doing for the last year! EA started the $10 plan, where they hand out a code with every copy of the game for free DLC, and then have the DLC for sale online for $10 or more. Bad Company 2 had that in the form of new game modes and maps, Madden (and other sports games by EA) have it in form of a pass that lets you play online, Mass Effect 2 had the Cerberus Network and Dragon Age Origins had Shale for free with a code that came with the game.zfactor said:Well, my answer is a combo of "I want the DLC" and "The game should be awesome." My opinion on DLC is actually very low (I FUCKING HATE IT--it was made to get money from all the people who buy the games used, but I never do that, so producers should give codes in all new games that unlocks all the DLC for free, and make the used buyers pay for it). This pre-order comes close to my vision for DLC (since it is free if you pre order), so hopefully my support for it will make the industry realize that free DLC to new buyers and preorders is the way to go. And then they will do it for ME3, because I was forced to give them $10 for the ME2 Liara DLC... And I paid $60 for the collector's edition (anyone else know why they chose that name?).
In short, yes it is worth it because you get free DLC.
Yeah, well it was just a few DLCs not all the DLC... I want all the DLC to be free with a new game purchase... ME2 had some of the DLC free (not the Liara one though...), Dragon age had only Shale free. Those are the only EA games I got last year, and they have the closest to new games get free DLC. But it should be all the DLC (or at least all the good DLC, I don't want extra weapon and armor packs, I want more missions and more story).
I think it depends alot on how you view BioWare games.Blazingdragoon04 said:That being said, I do like Bioware, and I want to support them. But I am on a budget, and I'm still skeptical. What are you all planning to do?
I don't mind DLC, but DLC that was developed before Day 1 should always be free, it was made during the development of the game.JeanLuc761 said:I pre-ordered the game simply because I love Bioware and I was impressed by the free "Signature Edition" upgrade. Whether or not I end up buying the game is up in the air, but my pre-order is fully refundable so there really is no risk here.
Were you playing it on a console? None of your complaints sprang to mind when I was playing it on the PC, anyway.Comic Sans said:I was actually unimpressed by the demo. The battles look flashier but the nuts and bolts are similar. The graphics are appalling, at least in the bit I played. The Darkspawn look like cartoons, not the frightening monsters they were in the first one. It's simply too cartoony. The camera is also not suitable for someone like the rogue, who needs to be flipping around. The top-down view means I can't see archers until I'm on top of them, and while I get the idea (targeting enemies in a crowd), I'd rather have less enemies than the swarms I was fighting and a better camera angle.
I'll finish the demo later, maybe it will change my mind. But as of now, meh.
Play the demo. It gives you at least some picture of what the main characters are like.burningdragoon said:Hard to say if it's worth it since it won't be out til March. I want to know as little about the story and characters as possible before hand so I haven't following it closely. I checked out a gameplay trailer and the combat looked like an improvement over Origins. Though if it didn't come with a decent amount of bonus stuff, I wouldn't have pre-ordered it.
If you are worrying about money and don't mind not playing games asap, then just wait it out. Everything drops in price eventually.
(For the poll: combo of all 3 yes options so... I pass on voting)
I'm playing on PC with the settings on High and with 1920x1080 resolution (no AA though). It looks like crap. The animations on the human characters are better, but the style just feels different from DA:O in a bad way.mireko said:Were you playing it on a console? None of your complaints sprang to mind when I was playing it on the PC, anyway.Comic Sans said:I was actually unimpressed by the demo. The battles look flashier but the nuts and bolts are similar. The graphics are appalling, at least in the bit I played. The Darkspawn look like cartoons, not the frightening monsters they were in the first one. It's simply too cartoony. The camera is also not suitable for someone like the rogue, who needs to be flipping around. The top-down view means I can't see archers until I'm on top of them, and while I get the idea (targeting enemies in a crowd), I'd rather have less enemies than the swarms I was fighting and a better camera angle.
I'll finish the demo later, maybe it will change my mind. But as of now, meh.
The darkspawn are fortunately not the main focus of the game, but the overall change in design is wonderful imho. The city in the second part of the demo is so much better than anything we saw in Origins.
EDIT: Argh, this thread is ancient.
I kind of agree. It had a lot of aspects I liked, but I couldn't get myself to like it as much as I wanted to. The dungeon length is probably what got to me. They were LOOOOOOONG, especially the Deep Roads. I think people like it because it's a throwback to Baldur's Gate and the like. I never played those, so I have no nostalgia for the game style.BoredDragon said:Ok, I've said this on every thread containing Dragon Age and I have yet to get a fulfilling answer (or any answer for that matter) about why people like this game.
I have played Dragon Age: Origins and I didn't particularly like it. To me, is seemed like WoW minus the multiplayer and it perplexes me on how many people like it so much.
Can someone tell me why so many people love Dragon Age?
I'm perplexed by what you mean by that. Clarify A) how Dragon Age feels liek "WoW minus multiplayer", and B) why this should be construed negatively.BoredDragon said:Ok, I've said this on every thread containing Dragon Age and I have yet to get a fulfilling answer (or any answer for that matter) about why people like this game.
I have played Dragon Age: Origins and I didn't particularly like it. To me, is seemed like WoW minus the multiplayer and it perplexes me on how many people like it so much.
Can someone tell me why so many people love Dragon Age?
Ok I'll try to clarify what I mean.Kimarous said:I'm perplexed by what you mean by that. Clarify A) how Dragon Age feels liek "WoW minus multiplayer", and B) why this should be construed negatively.BoredDragon said:Ok, I've said this on every thread containing Dragon Age and I have yet to get a fulfilling answer (or any answer for that matter) about why people like this game.
I have played Dragon Age: Origins and I didn't particularly like it. To me, is seemed like WoW minus the multiplayer and it perplexes me on how many people like it so much.
Can someone tell me why so many people love Dragon Age?