That was an example, but whatever. I'm not really pointing out that people will get wings ,because of evolution, in the future. That will propably be done with GM ( no it's not General Motors) before that.Cliff_m85 said:
. He makes even the dry side of science fun! ;D
It was an example.. Of a big change in Evolution.theultimateend said:
How do you know God is a fictional creature though?bladeofdarkness said:the flaw with the "there is no evidence AGAINST the existence of god" argument is that if you try and apply it to any other fictional creature you'd get laughed out of the room.
just try it
"there is not proof that dragons dont exist, in fact most human civilizations at one point or another believed in the existance of dragons"
"you cant disprove the tooth fairy"
"santa is real until proven otherwise"
try it at home, its fun
Actually you have a 50% chance of being right. However if you were a theist you'd have a much smaller chance. Taken all the religions, all the branchs of those religions, and the chance that the deity is from a religion we don't yet have....their chance plummets.Kriptonite said:
None, I suppose if that's the way you wan to think about it. Whats with the whole "Religion don't let you lern nothin'" thing going on lately? I seek knowledge like any other person religious or otherwise, I also aspire to do something beside fight with people on teh internets like Genealogy, Astronomy, hell maybe even be a Historian. There is no rule in the Bible that's said you much turn off your brain and shut out all logic. Logic also depends on the person, what seems a logical choise to one person may seem totally idiotic and ignorant to another.theultimateend said:
The thing is, a theory is called a theory because it hasn't been 100% proven. If it were, I do believe it would be called a theorem.Cliff_m85 said:
how do you know dragons are ?Zombie_Fish said:How do you know God is a fictional creature though?bladeofdarkness said:the flaw with the "there is no evidence AGAINST the existence of god" argument is that if you try and apply it to any other fictional creature you'd get laughed out of the room.
just try it
"there is not proof that dragons dont exist, in fact most human civilizations at one point or another believed in the existance of dragons"
"you cant disprove the tooth fairy"
"santa is real until proven otherwise"
try it at home, its fun
And what's wrong with dragons anyways? No seriously, just because we've attributed something to mythology doesn't mean to debunk it entirely. Though if it fits, we can 6.0 dragons.Zombie_Fish said:How do you know God is a fictional creature though?bladeofdarkness said:the flaw with the "there is no evidence AGAINST the existence of god" argument is that if you try and apply it to any other fictional creature you'd get laughed out of the room.
just try it
"there is not proof that dragons dont exist, in fact most human civilizations at one point or another believed in the existance of dragons"
"you cant disprove the tooth fairy"
"santa is real until proven otherwise"
try it at home, its fun
I never mentioned that they were fictional or not. We do have no proof that they are real.bladeofdarkness said:how do you know dragons are ?Zombie_Fish said:How do you know God is a fictional creature though?bladeofdarkness said:the flaw with the "there is no evidence AGAINST the existence of god" argument is that if you try and apply it to any other fictional creature you'd get laughed out of the room.
just try it
"there is not proof that dragons dont exist, in fact most human civilizations at one point or another believed in the existance of dragons"
"you cant disprove the tooth fairy"
"santa is real until proven otherwise"
try it at home, its fun
Actually you are completely and utterly wrong. Science doesn't deal in absolutes. Nothing is 100% proven because it constantly must be questioned and tested. Gravity is a theory as well.Akai Shizuku said:
Very bad example. I would have pointed out that the pinky toe is getting smaller in people and will likely not exist in the distant future because of the advent of shoes. With Shoes it is an entirely unnecessary body part. However! It will take a long time since you'll have people with pinky toes and people without pinky toes breeding. All depends on if it is a dominant gene.Supraliminal said:
does the fact that i dont know if they are or arent means that the chances are 50% for either options ?Zombie_Fish said:How do you know they aren't?bladeofdarkness said:how do you know dragons are ?Zombie_Fish said:How do you know God is a fictional creature though?bladeofdarkness said:the flaw with the "there is no evidence AGAINST the existence of god" argument is that if you try and apply it to any other fictional creature you'd get laughed out of the room.
just try it
"there is not proof that dragons dont exist, in fact most human civilizations at one point or another believed in the existance of dragons"
"you cant disprove the tooth fairy"
"santa is real until proven otherwise"
try it at home, its fun
Sorry mate, Not very good with sarcasm. But immersion, although it is a theory, is like any fact in it's early stage's. It's very simple, and has many examples, in human history, the natural world, and the universe. Like a star forming, that's an example of immersion, matter itself, was created through a chotic amount of energy, and radiation, Society was created by nomads who had to go through a drastic cooling down of the planet, a cold part of an ice-age, which afterwards, taught them techniques for settling down, and farming.Akai Shizuku said:
