I would say that beating something to death with an improvised club is right in there with straight up horror.hondommond said:He got wood. Heh heh heh...
I would say that beating something to death with an improvised club is right in there with straight up horror.hondommond said:He got wood. Heh heh heh...
Wayneguard said:Your revisionist history of the resident evil franchise is false. Only people who have beaten the games and know the proper paths to take run around with lots of ammo and herbs. When you first go through the mansion and have no fucking clue where to go, which enemies to expend ammo on or when the next typewriter/herb will come along, you are scared shitless of tackling the next room. Resident Evil 0-3 are about the farthest thing from action horror you can get, unless you consider standing stationary while slowly firing a pea shooter into one or two oncoming enemies a hallmark "action" gameplay.
Evidently, you played the originals and then resi4/5 and were unable to see a difference in form... thus you are deserving of this picture:
![]()
Survival is key.hondommond said:Call of duty 4: Your placed in a war and have to survive...Survival Horror
Now that made me giggle.Mr.K. said:Not only is it the best game ever made, it is also on a whole new level where we can only really commemorate this achievement through song and dance.
Depends on how you play them.hondommond said:A lot of people seem to be following the herd with all the bad reviews out there complaining about how Resident Evil is straying away from its "Survival Horror" roots and going toward the Generic Shooter type genre that for the most part clogs the current gaming market; But let me fill you in on a little something RESIDENT EVIL WAS NEVER ACTUALLY A SURVIVAL HORROR GAME! Resident Evil 1-3 were all Action Horror Shooters. Back in our childhoods we were more easily scared and took these games slow fearing whatever could be hiding around the next corner or through the next door/loading screen; and since then it has been taken out of context and been declared a Survival Horror game. The perfect example of a survival horror game from that time is Silent Hill for PSone. Silent Hill is a SURVIVAL HORROR GAME! Guns, weapons, and ammo are truly scarce.
I think this is the most important point. Sure, you could easily pick apart what counts and survival horror and what doesn't. You can even do so retroactively if that floats your boat. Those goalposts have been moved before, and they'll likely be moved again. At it's heart, though, RE6 is still clearly an action game and that's where it at worst fails miserably and at best barely scrapes by. Other than any minute appeal that the RE name still holds, there are tons of better action games out there these days in pretty much every way. If "the best zombie game" is only equal to a middling "non zombie game" then I weep for the quallity of "zombie games."DrunkOnEstus said:If my opinion matters, I don't give a good god damn whether 6 is horror, survival horror, or any kind of genre. As a game on its own merits, it fails. The dizzying camera shaking, the incessant QTEs, overpowered joke melee combat, being forced to play online or babysit an AI companion if I want to play alone, and an engine that is somehow worse than 5 with even worse shooting controls make it a bad game by any name or genre IMO.
EDIT: I don't know how others feel, but I find it insulting to be told that I'm "following the herd" just because my opinion happens to be in line with a majority of others. Godwin's Law and all, but I'll happily "follow the herd" in being glad that Hitler is dead.
Capcom never actually called RE6 'survival horror'. They call it 'dramatic horror'.FalloutJack said:Ummm...yeah, funny story. When you are the frenchise that coins the term "Survival Horror", you determine the meaning of that statement. Resident Evil was the Trope-Maker and you can't actually unmake that. And strictly speeaking, it IS survival horror...because DOOM is action-horror. In fact, Doom is action-horror to the exclusion of even a relevent plot!
RE became truly more action-oriented at about the range of RE5, whereas...
RE1 is the romp through a mysterious mansion of traps, zombies, and terror after having run from a legion of undead canines in the woods. It is survival.
RE2 is the plunge into a city infected by the virus and then trying to escape safely. It is survival.
RE3 is kind of the same thing as 2, but from someone else's POV and plotline. It is survival.
RE4 starts to be more...action-ish with its divergent plotline and rescue mission business, but...you kind of get trapped in the domain of Las Plagus and need to escape. (It's handwaved for being a good game.) This too is survival.
The rest...that's their own fault. But uhhh...don't tell the owners what their product is when they invented the phrase they describe it as. That's just silly.
Right because RE6 is ragged on primarily because it's not dramatic horror/survival horror. So you're saying, it has absolutely nothing to do with it being a bit of a mess. Although I will agree the Destructoid review gave it a score equaling it to be unplayable, but IGN's review was pretty fair a high seven for an average game with it's head stuck up its on arse.Kopikatsu said:Capcom never actually called RE6 'survival horror'. They call it 'dramatic horror'.FalloutJack said:Ummm...yeah, funny story. When you are the frenchise that coins the term "Survival Horror", you determine the meaning of that statement. Resident Evil was the Trope-Maker and you can't actually unmake that. And strictly speeaking, it IS survival horror...because DOOM is action-horror. In fact, Doom is action-horror to the exclusion of even a relevent plot!
RE became truly more action-oriented at about the range of RE5, whereas...
RE1 is the romp through a mysterious mansion of traps, zombies, and terror after having run from a legion of undead canines in the woods. It is survival.
RE2 is the plunge into a city infected by the virus and then trying to escape safely. It is survival.
RE3 is kind of the same thing as 2, but from someone else's POV and plotline. It is survival.
RE4 starts to be more...action-ish with its divergent plotline and rescue mission business, but...you kind of get trapped in the domain of Las Plagus and need to escape. (It's handwaved for being a good game.) This too is survival.
The rest...that's their own fault. But uhhh...don't tell the owners what their product is when they invented the phrase they describe it as. That's just silly.
I really liked RE6, but I felt as though the distinction is important. They went and invented a new subgenre for this game to be put into, and then people (both reviewers and gamers) review bomb it for not being survival horror. Which it was never claimed to be in the first place. Derp.
Let me point out from the poll 52% of the people have not played it and don't plan to. If you haven't played it and you say its a bad game. To me that means one thing...You heard someone elses review of it and your opinion is bias to what they think...Following the herdDrunkOnEstus said:EDIT: I don't know how others feel, but I find it insulting to be told that I'm "following the herd" just because my opinion happens to be in line with a majority of others. Godwin's Law and all, but I'll happily "follow the herd" in being glad that Hitler is dead.