If its taxed like cigarettes, it would be a great cash cow.
Best reason here.Strategia said:Hemp should be legal, and IMO so should cannabis. Your friend may have been killed by a stoned driver, but then again drunk driving is illegal (and IMO and those of countless others with or without personal experience, not punished nearly heavily enough), so why should stoned driving be?
Besides, banning the product doesn't lead to anything except organised crime and poorer quality, even immediately dangerous, product. I'm sure you've all heard of the Prohibition, and how this gave rise to massive criminal cartels, and how home-brew or illegally brewn alcohol could cause symptoms such as blindness and death upon ingestion. The same thing applies with any other kind of drug, yet most Western nations have been attempting to eradicate drug use by completely banning it for decades despite the fact that such attempts have been proven futile, counterproductive and immensely dangerous.
Add to that the fact that if cannabis is legalised, and marijuana and joints would be sold next to tobacco and cigarettes, taxes could be levied on them amounting to millions or perhaps even billions of dollars. Compare that to what the US is currently spending on anti-drug enforcement. Yes, drug use might increase, but regulation and taxation would make the resulting situation so much better in all respects.