Poll: Should cellphones be called something else now?

Recommended Videos

Skeleon

New member
Nov 2, 2007
5,410
0
0
We call them "handies".
I'd like to call them French Epstein Devices in reference to System Shock 2, though.
 

HotFezz8

New member
Nov 1, 2009
1,139
0
0
yeah im english so thsi entire converstaion is lost on me. lol we haven't called a mobile a cell phone for about a decade.

interesting side note, the germans call their mobiles "handies".

that said if you were going to change the name (and why its called a cell phone is to begin with is beyond me) mobile phone would be a more logical name...
 

Angerwing

Kid makes a post...
Jun 1, 2009
1,734
0
41
King of the Sandbox said:
Angerwing said:
King of the Sandbox said:
SextusMaximus said:
Here they're called Mobiles. It's very suitable, because they're mobile...
Mobile what though? Say phone, and if it takes pictures, texts and surfs the web, I'll e-smack you for not reading the OP.
Mobile multi-purpose devices. Mobiles for short.
Mobile just seems kind of redundant to me. I mean, what isn't mobile these days? But you may be onto something with the MPD (multi-purpose device). ^_^
Problem with that is that it's too generic. It doesn't tell me what it is. It tells me that it does a couple of things, but for all intensive purposes (they see me trolling...), it's just a widget. Phone, or mobile phone gives an idea of what it is. Just with tons of added features.

MPD would grow to have obvious connotations towards what we now know as mobile phones, but why bother when they already allude to what it is, despite the name?
 

Joshimodo

New member
Sep 13, 2008
1,956
0
0
Nobody outside the US call them cellphones.

Mobile phones or mobiles.



King of the Sandbox said:
Uhm, people who favor logic? It just seems so out of place for me to call them phones anymore, as I see more texting and photo sharing than actual calls nowadays. Hell, I had a friend pick up his phone, tell me he was busy doing something, and asked me to text him instead.

I raged so hard.
It seems out of place to call things that are phones with added features something completely different? If they lost the ability to call people and communicate, fair enough, but the fact is they're still phones.

How is it logical to change an established staple word just because the product has whistles and bells?
 

Deadlock Radium

New member
Mar 29, 2009
2,276
0
0
Downfall89 said:
In Australia they are called Mobile Phones. And that is what they are; mobile phones. Why should we change it?
It's called Mobile Phones [SUB](Or in Norwegian: Mobiltelefon)[/SUB] here in Norway too, and I don't want to change it.

It just sounds weird hearing "Hey, check your com."
"Hey, check your mobile phone [SUB](Or just phone)[/SUB]" sounds waaay better.
 

SultanP

New member
Mar 15, 2009
985
0
0
I don't agree that they should be called something else just because they can do more. Like the car is still a car, a mobile phone is still a mobile phone, it can just do other things as well.

I feel like I should say more about it, but that's really all there is to it. It doesn't stop being a phone just because it can do more.

Edit:
Joshimodo said:
It seems out of place to call things that are phones with added features something completely different? If they lost the ability to call people and communicate, fair enough, but the fact is they're still phones.

How is it logical to change an established staple word just because the product has whistles and bells?
Exactly this. Guess it could be more eloquent than what I said.
 

Downfall89

New member
Aug 26, 2009
330
0
0
Deadlock Radium said:
Downfall89 said:
In Australia they are called Mobile Phones. And that is what they are; mobile phones. Why should we change it?
It's called Mobile Phones [SUB](Or in Norwegian: Mobiltelefon)[/SUB] here in Norway too, and I don't want to change it.

It just sounds weird hearing "Hey, check your com."
"Hey, check your mobile phone [SUB](Or just phone)[/SUB]" sounds waaay better.
Actually yeah, it does sound better.
 

oppp7

New member
Aug 29, 2009
7,045
0
0
I don't see the point in politically correct stuff. They're just powerful cellphones. If they aren't phones and still do that then ya, call them something else. But otherwise no.
 

teebeeohh

New member
Jun 17, 2009
2,896
0
0
keep it the way it is, we still call modern sidearms guns and they don't have much in common with the things that had the same name 500 years ago
 

King of the Sandbox

& His Royal +4 Bucket of Doom
Jan 22, 2010
3,268
0
0
Danny Ocean said:
King of the Sandbox said:
Pretty basic question here; since cellphones are now basically personal computers/cameras/phones/etc, kinda like Leela's arm thingy, should they be called something else?
Omni-Tools!

With a bit of tinkering we could basically have those anyway!
I'm down with that. ^_^

Angerwing said:
King of the Sandbox said:
Angerwing said:
King of the Sandbox said:
SextusMaximus said:
Here they're called Mobiles. It's very suitable, because they're mobile...
Mobile what though? Say phone, and if it takes pictures, texts and surfs the web, I'll e-smack you for not reading the OP.
Mobile multi-purpose devices. Mobiles for short.
Mobile just seems kind of redundant to me. I mean, what isn't mobile these days? But you may be onto something with the MPD (multi-purpose device). ^_^
Problem with that is that it's too generic. It doesn't tell me what it is. It tells me that it does a couple of things, but for all intensive purposes (they see me trolling...), it's just a widget. Phone, or mobile phone gives an idea of what it is. Just with tons of added features.

MPD would grow to have obvious connotations towards what we now know as mobile phones, but why bother when they already allude to what it is, despite the name?

Oh, I just think we should to change things up and to be more clear on the devices function.

Joshimodo said:
Nobody outside the US call them cellphones.

Mobile phones or mobiles.



King of the Sandbox said:
Uhm, people who favor logic? It just seems so out of place for me to call them phones anymore, as I see more texting and photo sharing than actual calls nowadays. Hell, I had a friend pick up his phone, tell me he was busy doing something, and asked me to text him instead.

I raged so hard.
It seems out of place to call things that are phones with added features something completely different? If they lost the ability to call people and communicate, fair enough, but the fact is they're still phones.

How is it logical to change an established staple word just because the product has whistles and bells?
It just is in my mind, since it does so much more, and distinguishes itself from a normal mobile phone. Like smartphones, but with a better name than that, without specifically indicating phones. Basically, the phone part goes without saying, is the best way I can put my thinking here.

Deadlock Radium said:
Downfall89 said:
In Australia they are called Mobile Phones. And that is what they are; mobile phones. Why should we change it?
It's called Mobile Phones [SUB](Or in Norwegian: Mobiltelefon)[/SUB] here in Norway too, and I don't want to change it.

It just sounds weird hearing "Hey, check your com."
"Hey, check your mobile phone [SUB](Or just phone)[/SUB]" sounds waaay better.
I humbly disagree. "Check your com." sounds infinitely cooler, imo.

Also, I FUCKING GET IT ALREADY. NOT EVERYONE CALLS THEM CELL PHONES. I UNDERSTAND. THANK YOU. MOVE ON, PLEASE.

( BTW, The bold isn't for inflection or 'yelling', just an attempt to get people to actually get that they're called other things other places already and stop posting comments just to say it.)
 

Pilkingtube

Edible
Mar 24, 2010
481
0
0
King of the Sandbox said:
Downfall89 said:
In Australia they are called Mobile Phones. And that is what they are; mobile phones. Why should we change it?
Well, ok, Mobile/cell differences aside, the reason I'd like to see it changed is because they do so much more now, as I mentioned in the OP. It's like calling a modern car a horseless carriage. It's kinda silly, because while in the past, yes, that's what it was, it's now so much more, what with phones in them, GPS, HUDs, electrical outlets, etc, etc.

That's what I was getting at.
That's what car is short for.. carriage :S
so yes, we sortof still do call them horseless carriages, but, just carriage :p
Following that logic, I say stick to mobile phone, but just drop it to phone, which most people do anyway, and you arrive at the same place :)
 

King of the Sandbox

& His Royal +4 Bucket of Doom
Jan 22, 2010
3,268
0
0
Pilkingtube said:
King of the Sandbox said:
Downfall89 said:
In Australia they are called Mobile Phones. And that is what they are; mobile phones. Why should we change it?
Well, ok, Mobile/cell differences aside, the reason I'd like to see it changed is because they do so much more now, as I mentioned in the OP. It's like calling a modern car a horseless carriage. It's kinda silly, because while in the past, yes, that's what it was, it's now so much more, what with phones in them, GPS, HUDs, electrical outlets, etc, etc.

That's what I was getting at.
That's what car is short for.. carriage :S
so yes, we sortof still do call them horseless carriages, but, just carriage :p
Following that logic, I say stick to mobile phone, but just drop it to phone, which most people do anyway, and you arrive at the same place :)
Eh, that was a bad example, I said so in an earlier post. But yeah, I see your thinking there.
 

Ewyx

New member
Dec 3, 2008
375
0
0
Nope, they're phones. Because their primary use is still the same as it was when they first came out. They tack on some stuff, but the primary reason people buy phones, is so they can call people and can be reached even if not at home. Everything else is just a bonus. See, the kicker here is, if people want a PDA-like device, they'll buy a PDA-like device. The funny thing is, while mobile phones can do emails, video games and a shitload, most people still primarily use them for what is considered their primary purpose, that is phoning others.

Sure, there are some tech-geeks that'll use their phone, download the source from your svn repository and start fixing the code, and compile it afterward (true story, not mine though), but these are still the minority. (I so want that Nokia phone, screw iPhones)

Also comms, seriously? Comms? That sounds just horrible. Mostly because it's a colloquial term for pretty much any communication line. Me thinks the OP didn't think this through.
 

Angerwing

Kid makes a post...
Jun 1, 2009
1,734
0
41
King of the Sandbox said:
Angerwing said:
King of the Sandbox said:
Angerwing said:
King of the Sandbox said:
SextusMaximus said:
Here they're called Mobiles. It's very suitable, because they're mobile...
Mobile what though? Say phone, and if it takes pictures, texts and surfs the web, I'll e-smack you for not reading the OP.
Mobile multi-purpose devices. Mobiles for short.
Mobile just seems kind of redundant to me. I mean, what isn't mobile these days? But you may be onto something with the MPD (multi-purpose device). ^_^
Problem with that is that it's too generic. It doesn't tell me what it is. It tells me that it does a couple of things, but for all intensive purposes (they see me trolling...), it's just a widget. Phone, or mobile phone gives an idea of what it is. Just with tons of added features.

MPD would grow to have obvious connotations towards what we now know as mobile phones, but why bother when they already allude to what it is, despite the name?

Oh, I just think we should to change things up and to be more clear on the devices function.
But Com or Omni-tool is actually less clear than 'phone'.

Fancy that.
 

NuclearPenguin

New member
Oct 29, 2009
2,946
0
0
Downfall89 said:
In Australia they are called Mobile Phones. And that is what they are; mobile phones. Why should we change it?
Mobile camera GPS gaming systems with an inbuilt phone somewhere in there.