Poll: Should games like "Super Columbine Massacre RPG!" be allowed?

[Gasaraki]

Yes, because the day we stop being allowed to discuss tragic events, no matter the amount of respect the subject is treated with, is the day that I start building an underwater fortress to spend the rest of my life in.

So, to be clear, you think that we need a game called 'super columbine massacre' so we can discuss this awful event?

Are you fucking serious?

You must be some fucking thirteen year old moron to even consider that as a point of view. Get some sense ffs!

Did you... did you even read my post?

 

[Wintermoot]

freedom of speech although I don,t condone games like these they are covered by it.

 

[Xan Krieger]

SNIP

From wikipedia's page on Hiroshima:
The bombing of Tokyo and other cities in Japan during World War II caused widespread destruction and hundreds of thousands of deaths, nearly all civilians, predominantly women and children.[14] For example, Toyama, an urban area of 128,000, was nearly fully destroyed, and incendiary attacks on Tokyo are believed to have claimed 90,000 lives. There were no such air raids in Hiroshima. However, the threat was certainly there and to protect against potential firebombings in Hiroshima, students (between 11?14 years) were mobilized to demolish houses and create firebreaks.[15]
On Monday, August 6, 1945, at 8:15 AM, the Atomic Bomb "Little Boy" was dropped on Hiroshima by an American B-29 bomber, the Enola Gay,[16] directly killing an estimated 80,000 people. By the end of the year, injury and radiation brought total casualties to 90,000?140,000.[17] Approximately 69% of the city's buildings were completely destroyed, and about 7% severely damaged.

From wikipedia's page on Nagasaki:

On August 9, 1945, Nagasaki was the target of the United State's second atomic bomb attack (and second detonation of a plutonium bomb; the first was tested in central New Mexico, USA) at 11:02 a.m., when the north of the city was destroyed and an estimated 70,000 people were killed by the bomb codenamed "Fat Man." According to statistics found within Nagasaki Peace Park, the death toll from the atomic bombing totalled 73,884, including 2,000 Korean forced workers[7] and eight POWs, as well as another 74,909 injured, and another several hundred thousand diseased and dying due to fallout and other illness caused by radiation.

How is that any less evil?

This was covered in many pages in a topic on this forum, either we hit them with the bombs or we invaded and the latter would've been a lot worse for both countries. The bombing was an effort to save lives, to end the war with less bloodshed.

 

[Susurrus]

SNIP

From wikipedia's page on Hiroshima:
The bombing of Tokyo and other cities in Japan during World War II caused widespread destruction and hundreds of thousands of deaths, nearly all civilians, predominantly women and children.[14] For example, Toyama, an urban area of 128,000, was nearly fully destroyed, and incendiary attacks on Tokyo are believed to have claimed 90,000 lives. There were no such air raids in Hiroshima. However, the threat was certainly there and to protect against potential firebombings in Hiroshima, students (between 11?14 years) were mobilized to demolish houses and create firebreaks.[15]
On Monday, August 6, 1945, at 8:15 AM, the Atomic Bomb "Little Boy" was dropped on Hiroshima by an American B-29 bomber, the Enola Gay,[16] directly killing an estimated 80,000 people. By the end of the year, injury and radiation brought total casualties to 90,000?140,000.[17] Approximately 69% of the city's buildings were completely destroyed, and about 7% severely damaged.

From wikipedia's page on Nagasaki:

On August 9, 1945, Nagasaki was the target of the United State's second atomic bomb attack (and second detonation of a plutonium bomb; the first was tested in central New Mexico, USA) at 11:02 a.m., when the north of the city was destroyed and an estimated 70,000 people were killed by the bomb codenamed "Fat Man." According to statistics found within Nagasaki Peace Park, the death toll from the atomic bombing totalled 73,884, including 2,000 Korean forced workers[7] and eight POWs, as well as another 74,909 injured, and another several hundred thousand diseased and dying due to fallout and other illness caused by radiation.

How is that any less evil?

This was covered in many pages in a topic on this forum, either we hit them with the bombs or we invaded and the latter would've been a lot worse for both countries. The bombing was an effort to save lives, to end the war with less bloodshed.

Doesn't make it any less evil, I'm afraid. Lesser of two evils, maybe. Still evil.

 

[funguy2121]

Elaborate...

Let em. Just don't put cameras in their house and bug their shit.

/\ This /\

Edit: Sorry mods! What I meant to say was...

Dear sir, I agree most thoroughly with your assertions. You see, earlier, I was not nearly as eloquent as you. But when you said the above it perfectly encapsulated my thoughts on the matter. And now, I bid you and the threat of a low-content post good day!

 

[Xan Krieger]

SNIP

From wikipedia's page on Hiroshima:
The bombing of Tokyo and other cities in Japan during World War II caused widespread destruction and hundreds of thousands of deaths, nearly all civilians, predominantly women and children.[14] For example, Toyama, an urban area of 128,000, was nearly fully destroyed, and incendiary attacks on Tokyo are believed to have claimed 90,000 lives. There were no such air raids in Hiroshima. However, the threat was certainly there and to protect against potential firebombings in Hiroshima, students (between 11?14 years) were mobilized to demolish houses and create firebreaks.[15]
On Monday, August 6, 1945, at 8:15 AM, the Atomic Bomb "Little Boy" was dropped on Hiroshima by an American B-29 bomber, the Enola Gay,[16] directly killing an estimated 80,000 people. By the end of the year, injury and radiation brought total casualties to 90,000?140,000.[17] Approximately 69% of the city's buildings were completely destroyed, and about 7% severely damaged.

From wikipedia's page on Nagasaki:

On August 9, 1945, Nagasaki was the target of the United State's second atomic bomb attack (and second detonation of a plutonium bomb; the first was tested in central New Mexico, USA) at 11:02 a.m., when the north of the city was destroyed and an estimated 70,000 people were killed by the bomb codenamed "Fat Man." According to statistics found within Nagasaki Peace Park, the death toll from the atomic bombing totalled 73,884, including 2,000 Korean forced workers[7] and eight POWs, as well as another 74,909 injured, and another several hundred thousand diseased and dying due to fallout and other illness caused by radiation.

How is that any less evil?

This was covered in many pages in a topic on this forum, either we hit them with the bombs or we invaded and the latter would've been a lot worse for both countries. The bombing was an effort to save lives, to end the war with less bloodshed.

Doesn't make it any less evil, I'm afraid. Lesser of two evils, maybe. Still evil.

War by it's nature is evil, but at least we tried to make it not so bad while the Japanese went out of their way to make it as horrific as possible.

 

[funguy2121]

SNIP

From wikipedia's page on Hiroshima:
The bombing of Tokyo and other cities in Japan during World War II caused widespread destruction and hundreds of thousands of deaths, nearly all civilians, predominantly women and children.[14] For example, Toyama, an urban area of 128,000, was nearly fully destroyed, and incendiary attacks on Tokyo are believed to have claimed 90,000 lives. There were no such air raids in Hiroshima. However, the threat was certainly there and to protect against potential firebombings in Hiroshima, students (between 11?14 years) were mobilized to demolish houses and create firebreaks.[15]
On Monday, August 6, 1945, at 8:15 AM, the Atomic Bomb "Little Boy" was dropped on Hiroshima by an American B-29 bomber, the Enola Gay,[16] directly killing an estimated 80,000 people. By the end of the year, injury and radiation brought total casualties to 90,000?140,000.[17] Approximately 69% of the city's buildings were completely destroyed, and about 7% severely damaged.

From wikipedia's page on Nagasaki:

On August 9, 1945, Nagasaki was the target of the United State's second atomic bomb attack (and second detonation of a plutonium bomb; the first was tested in central New Mexico, USA) at 11:02 a.m., when the north of the city was destroyed and an estimated 70,000 people were killed by the bomb codenamed "Fat Man." According to statistics found within Nagasaki Peace Park, the death toll from the atomic bombing totalled 73,884, including 2,000 Korean forced workers[7] and eight POWs, as well as another 74,909 injured, and another several hundred thousand diseased and dying due to fallout and other illness caused by radiation.

How is that any less evil?

This was covered in many pages in a topic on this forum, either we hit them with the bombs or we invaded and the latter would've been a lot worse for both countries. The bombing was an effort to save lives, to end the war with less bloodshed.

Doesn't make it any less evil, I'm afraid. Lesser of two evils, maybe. Still evil.

War by it's nature is evil, but at least we tried to make it not so bad while the Japanese went out of their way to make it as horrific as possible.

Just curious, isn't this a thread about Columbine? Where was the left turn that you took to arriving at "who was more evil 60 years ago when none of us and none of our parents were alive?"

Too late to raise the flame shield? Well then I guess daddy's gonna get burned.

 

[Susurrus]

SNIP

From wikipedia's page on Hiroshima:
The bombing of Tokyo and other cities in Japan during World War II caused widespread destruction and hundreds of thousands of deaths, nearly all civilians, predominantly women and children.[14] For example, Toyama, an urban area of 128,000, was nearly fully destroyed, and incendiary attacks on Tokyo are believed to have claimed 90,000 lives. There were no such air raids in Hiroshima. However, the threat was certainly there and to protect against potential firebombings in Hiroshima, students (between 11?14 years) were mobilized to demolish houses and create firebreaks.[15]
On Monday, August 6, 1945, at 8:15 AM, the Atomic Bomb "Little Boy" was dropped on Hiroshima by an American B-29 bomber, the Enola Gay,[16] directly killing an estimated 80,000 people. By the end of the year, injury and radiation brought total casualties to 90,000?140,000.[17] Approximately 69% of the city's buildings were completely destroyed, and about 7% severely damaged.

From wikipedia's page on Nagasaki:

On August 9, 1945, Nagasaki was the target of the United State's second atomic bomb attack (and second detonation of a plutonium bomb; the first was tested in central New Mexico, USA) at 11:02 a.m., when the north of the city was destroyed and an estimated 70,000 people were killed by the bomb codenamed "Fat Man." According to statistics found within Nagasaki Peace Park, the death toll from the atomic bombing totalled 73,884, including 2,000 Korean forced workers[7] and eight POWs, as well as another 74,909 injured, and another several hundred thousand diseased and dying due to fallout and other illness caused by radiation.

How is that any less evil?

This was covered in many pages in a topic on this forum, either we hit them with the bombs or we invaded and the latter would've been a lot worse for both countries. The bombing was an effort to save lives, to end the war with less bloodshed.

Doesn't make it any less evil, I'm afraid. Lesser of two evils, maybe. Still evil.

War by it's nature is evil, but at least we tried to make it not so bad while the Japanese went out of their way to make it as horrific as possible.

Just curious, isn't this a thread about Columbine? Where was the left turn that you took to arriving at "who was more evil 60 years ago when none of us and none of our parents were alive?"

Too late to raise the flame shield? Well then I guess daddy's gonna get burned.

He suggested that the Jap/US conflict was as black and white evil as Columbine massacre, with a good side and a bad side. I disputed.

 

[CrazyGirl17]

I say no... but people will make this kinda thing anyway, I guarantee it.