Poll: Should Superheroes Become Licensed Crime Fighters and Rescuers Or Remain Vigilantes?

[irish286]

You realize what you're asking for is a more easily corruptible and far more powerful version of Shield right? No, governments are too corrupt and ineffective to be trusted with something like this. People keep trying to say Sokovia and New York would have been better with them supervised when that's just not true. With New York the Superheros would have been tasked with setting up a perimeter outside of the blast radius of the Nuke, in Sokovia they wouldn't even be there because they would either be in lockdown or still answering questions as to why they let Stark create Ultron.

 

[Cicada 5]

You realize what you're asking for is a more easily corruptible and far more powerful version of Shield right? No, governments are too corrupt and ineffective to be trusted with something like this. People keep trying to say Sokovia and New York would have been better with them supervised when that's just not true. With New York the Superheros would have been tasked with setting up a perimeter outside of the blast radius of the Nuke, in Sokovia they wouldn't even be there because they would either be in lockdown or still answering questions as to why they let Stark create Ultron.

There is such a thing as emergency responses. The Avengers would have had to explain themselves but it would have been after stopping Ultron. They also wouldn't have been allowed to put a terrorist on their team and shield her from justice. Governments are flawed, but unlicensed vigilantes are far worse.