I thought the answer was 10. Order of operations and all.faceless chick said:i can't believe this thread is still going.
seriously people..you're almost as bad as these guys:
![]()
NASA didnt name the moon, smart guy.Snowy Rainbow said:You don't care what the leading professionals in the world have named something? Fair enough.
*cough*
...Vykrel said:NASA didnt name the moon, smart guy.Snowy Rainbow said:You don't care what the leading professionals in the world have named something? Fair enough.
*cough*
I dunno... Google says I be right. And I like Google.Maraveno said:Nope you're dead wrongSnowy Rainbow said:I thought the answer was 10. Order of operations and all.faceless chick said:i can't believe this thread is still going.
seriously people..you're almost as bad as these guys:
![]()
10 + 10 x 0 = 10 + (10 x 0) = 10.
Right?
That rule only applies to unspecified numbers
10+10 x 0 = ?
10+10 =20
20 x 0 = 0
if anything you could write it as
(10+10)0=
God damn it, sir; I wanted to appear smarter than the average bear!The-Bad-Blooded said:Luna = Moon
Sol = Sun
they already have names
/entire thread
Boom! Suck on that astrologists! If Shepard says Pluto's a planet, then by god it is a planet.2fish said:Damn too late to be the smart one in this thread... oh well I shall take another role then.
Also Pluto is a planet because Mass Effect says so.
Even though they were proven wrong when presented with evidence from NASA and the IAU that our moon is called... Moon not Luna?Booze Zombie said:God damn it, sir; I wanted to appear smarter than the average bear!The-Bad-Blooded said:Luna = Moon
Sol = Sun
they already have names
/entire thread
10 + (10 x 0), not 10 (10+0).Maraveno said:Ehm I'm telling you 10(10+0) IS NOT THE SAMESnowy Rainbow said:I dunno... Google says I be right. And I like Google.Maraveno said:Nope you're dead wrongSnowy Rainbow said:I thought the answer was 10. Order of operations and all.faceless chick said:i can't believe this thread is still going.
seriously people..you're almost as bad as these guys:
![]()
10 + 10 x 0 = 10 + (10 x 0) = 10.
Right?
That rule only applies to unspecified numbers
10+10 x 0 = ?
10+10 =20
20 x 0 = 0
if anything you could write it as
(10+10)0=
[link]http://www.google.com/search?q=10+%2B+10+x+0&btnG=Google+Search[/link]
as 10+10 x 0
10(10+0)
would be
10 x 10 + 0
20+0 = 20
This is just ridiculous trolling now
Adding 0 or Multiplying by 0 are to different things
Also Solve media : Morbid obesity
That thing is fun
2+5*2-3*6/6Maraveno said:Ehm I'm telling you 10(10+0) IS NOT THE SAMESnowy Rainbow said:I dunno... Google says I be right. And I like Google.Maraveno said:Nope you're dead wrongSnowy Rainbow said:I thought the answer was 10. Order of operations and all.faceless chick said:i can't believe this thread is still going.
seriously people..you're almost as bad as these guys:
![]()
10 + 10 x 0 = 10 + (10 x 0) = 10.
Right?
That rule only applies to unspecified numbers
10+10 x 0 = ?
10+10 =20
20 x 0 = 0
if anything you could write it as
(10+10)0=
[link]http://www.google.com/search?q=10+%2B+10+x+0&btnG=Google+Search[/link]
as 10+10 x 0
10(10+0)
would be
10 x 10 + 0
20+0 = 20
This is just ridiculous trolling now
Adding 0 or Multiplying by 0 are to different things
Also Solve media : Morbid obesity
That thing is fun
That's still smarter than an average bear.Snowy Rainbow said:Even though they were proven wrong when presented with evidence from NASA and the IAU that our moon is called... Moon not Luna?
Wrong.Maraveno said:Nope you're dead wrongSnowy Rainbow said:I thought the answer was 10. Order of operations and all.faceless chick said:i can't believe this thread is still going.
seriously people..you're almost as bad as these guys:
![]()
10 + 10 x 0 = 10 + (10 x 0) = 10.
Right?
That rule only applies to unspecified numbers
10+10 x 0 = ?
10+10 =20
20 x 0 = 0
if anything you could write it as
(10+10)0=