*Poll: Should there be a liscense to use the Internet? *read before voting

Recommended Videos

Hectix777

New member
Feb 26, 2011
1,500
0
0
Now before you get on your high horse and say, "that's like Naziism the Internet is built foe the free exchange of information, building relationships with people in other countries, and," blah, blah, blah. Look, I'm just saying, some people prove too immature to use the Internet. I'm not saying that everything is locked down and kids don't use the real Internet until their 16, but you gotta admit, there should be some kind of limit. I've been on forums ranging from game reviews, political debates, and current events. I normally do this via Facebook because than I don't have to create an account. Anyways, I was reading an article about the earthquake in Japan and than I saw some kid go," LOLOLOL, ULTIMATE F*********** *******WADS, PAYBACK FOR PEARL HARBOR!!!!!!!1!1!1!!!!," I click on the little icon that takes you to their Facebook account and find out that he's like 11. Now I know this isn't the best example but here's another:

A couple of years ago I read an issue of Time magazine about his girl who crashed her now Porsche, bought by her father, and how she later died. The police officers that came to the crash site took photos of it and sent it to their nieces, nephews, and children to show them what bad driving could lead too. I managed it's way onto the Internet and people began posting things like," what a waste of Porsche," and,"one less ***** in the world." see? It's this kind of screwed up stuff that makes believe there should be some kind of right to the Internet. That our access porn when they're like 8.

Some of you might say,"they can't do that, there's an age verification system," or,"it's nothing to worry about, the mods will ban them," but that's bull. The age verification thing is bogus, all you gotta do is set it to January 1 and than a year where you are or older than 18, and just because a mod bans a user won't stop him from making a new email account on Yahoo! or Google and creating a new account on this website. The reason people can get away with this is because the Internet creates a mask: a twelve year old Asian kid in New Mexico could make himself to be Tony Montana with just a few words or keyboard clicks. You can be anyone on the Internet! That's what makes it dangerous, let's not forget about the "friends" kids meet on Facebook and how easy it is to fake an account. Creating a license or at least a code for Internet access could probably be for the best.

How will this work? First, pass a test verifying your maturity and responsibility of handling a tool of untold power like the Internet. Once you have passed the test, you will receive an ID (that may later be converted to a driver's license) that has a code granting web access. Once you have the code just type it in to a web browser and surf, or place it into a scanner if technology has come so far. If not to halt crime, at least to separate the immature web users who see it as a tool to be a racist, sexist, homophobic, prick and those who see the Internet as a not a tool but an entity, an entity that allows you to know the history of this planet, the ability to communicate with a person from the UK and someone in Japan, to the possibility of two girls and one cup.

Feel free to vote, post counter arguments of any length, or just add-ons to the testing/application process.
 

Zantos

New member
Jan 5, 2011
3,653
0
0
Overall, the internet should be used by everyone with free flow of information and opinions and all that jazz, however places like this should be seen as a privelidge and not a right. Just a short test before granting posting rights to check that people know how to type (none of this grammar nazi rubbish, but the basic ability to spell and sensible use of caps lock), along with a "Not really offensive, but kind of a dick" report option that marks a user for inspection from a mod would go a long way to keep conversation civilised and the sensible users nice and happy.
 

hayaineko

New member
Feb 28, 2011
27
0
0
I feel no, there shouldn't be. Of course, there are immoral people, but the internet is a place of anonymity, not just Facebook. Many people come to the internet to act immature so they don't do it in real life. Just because someone said "it's pay back for Pearl Harbour" doesn't require an ID for the internet. We'd be just like Mainland China then.

Now, I do believe child under 13 should only be able to use the internet with parental consent.
 

Actual

New member
Jun 24, 2008
1,220
0
0
Absolutely there should be. You need to take a test which proves you know how to maintain an anti-virus and not to click on stupid spam links which then spam all of your friends/contacts.

You fail the test no internet.

Everyone with half a brain should be able to do this and yet....

EDIT: Also, no-one under the age of 13 on the internet unless they are browsing with a parent/guardian present.
 

Radeonx

New member
Apr 26, 2009
7,013
0
0
Who decides maturity? You? A board of professors?
There is no one person/group who can rightfully decide when someone is "mature" enough, so this plan is idiotic and stupid.
 

PixelKing

Moderately confused.
Sep 4, 2009
1,733
0
0
Its not about age, its about maturity.
A 10yr old prodigy could be banned from the internet for his age but a stupid 20-something troll could roam free? That would just cause havoc.

EDIT: A child under 13 should be supervised by a parent/guardian? No, just no. Maybe a 12yr old wants to talk to his friends on facebook or play a flash game.
I also highly doubt parents would do this anyhow.
 

Thespian

New member
Sep 11, 2010
1,407
0
0
Imposing a licensing effect because you don't like some of the company you find on the internet is both primitive and poorly thought out, I'm afraid.

Radeonx said:
Who decides maturity? You? A board of professors?
There is no one person/group who can rightfully decide when someone is "mature" enough, so this plan is idiotic and stupid.
Then again, he puts it better than me.
 

Sassafrass

This is a placeholder
Legacy
Aug 24, 2009
51,250
1
3
Country
United Kingdom
Any other day I'd go ahead and say no but today I'm gonna go ahead and say fuck to the no.
And I haven't said that in ages.

Besides, how do we judge who is mature? What criteria are there?
Who overlooks all of this?
Who watches them all to make sure they are all being mature?
What happens when someone acts immature, an internet ban?
And who here can honestly say, hand on heart, that they've been mature all of their internet life? As I know I can't.

Simply put, it would become boring as fuck. Who gives a shit who uses the internet, if you see someone who annoys you, just remember the following tips. Close the page and forget about them. Simple.

Plus we wouldn't get stuff like this if this was ever introduced.
 

Hectix777

New member
Feb 26, 2011
1,500
0
0
Zantos said:
Overall, the internet should be used by everyone with free flow of information and opinions and all that jazz, however places like this should be seen as a privelidge and not a right. Just a short test before granting posting rights to check that people know how to type (none of this grammar nazi rubbish, but the basic ability to spell and sensible use of caps lock), along with a "Not really offensive, but kind of a dick" report option that marks a user for inspection from a mod would go a long way to keep conversation civilised and the sensible users nice and happy.
Being happy and civilized is not what I'm worried about, it's people using it to exploit the right of free speech like Glenn Beck (I'm a Democrat, we think Fox is nothing but a right-wing tool). While using this as a conversation tool, it can also be used to teach, give advice, guide, even one day perform operations. I mean, if the population of immature users becomes lower over time when compared to mature users, who knows what could happen! Maybe by reading other peoples comments, we could become more knowledgable or passionate about a topic by readin others topic or challenging theirs, and if challenged the person who posted that could open the eyes of the challenger to different view.
 

Exterminas

New member
Sep 22, 2009
1,130
0
0
It is funny how youself provide a valid point against your own statement:

That brat who died in the prosche had a driving license. Didn't stop her from crashing and dying. It lies in the nature of any license-test that it will never be able to prevent people from screwing up. If you make the test too hard, people will study for it, creating and unrealist result. If you make it easy, there won't be any point.

By your logic the existance of her driver's license would eliminate car crashes. It doesn't.
 

Hectix777

New member
Feb 26, 2011
1,500
0
0
PixelKing said:
Its not about age, its about maturity.
A 10yr old prodigy could be banned from the internet for his age but a stupid 20-something troll could roam free? That would just cause havoc.

EDIT: A child under 13 should be supervised by a parent/guardian? No, just no. Maybe a 12yr old wants to talk to his friends on facebook or play a flash game.
I also highly doubt parents would do this anyhow.
I'm with you maturity is more valuable than age. A ten year old traditional Chinese child is more mature than an 20 year old beer drinkin frat, no debate. If people show immaturity or take advantage of it maybe even we could ensue a week long ban to the Internet (with exception to educational/important school related website) or a fine . Parents are'nt actually going to look over their Childs shoulder to make sure they are at the right site, that's kinda lame.
 

Irony's Acolyte

Back from the Depths
Mar 9, 2010
3,636
0
0
Problem is, there are plenty of "Mature" people on the internet that can act totally immature when they want too. The anonymity helps bring out the rude and crude in people because there aren't many consequences for them.
 

NathLines

New member
May 23, 2010
689
0
0
Wow, I'm looking for the only thing that would make your post make sense but it isn't there. How in the world are you supposed to tell if someone is mature? I mean, a test which everyone in the entire world have to take? It has to be supervised; it can't be written test. If it's a written test, they could just do like you said: "set it to January 1 and then a year where you are or older than 18". If there's a written test you can easily lie. There's actually not anything that's stopping you from lying in a supervised test either. And it can't be a one-in-a-liftime test so if you screw up, you can just do it over and lie. A license really wouldn't help in any way. It's just something that would annoy the shit out of people.
 

Silas13013

New member
Mar 31, 2011
106
0
0
Exterminas said:
It is funny how youself provide a valid point against your own statement:

That brat who died in the prosche had a driving license. Didn't stop her from crashing and dying. It lies in the nature of any license-test that it will never be able to prevent people from screwing up. If you make the test too hard, people will study for it, creating and unrealist result. If you make it easy, there won't be any point.

By your logic the existance of her driver's license would eliminate car crashes. It doesn't.
This, several times over. I learned to use a computer when I was four and quickly bacame better adapt at using it than my mother or father, both of whom use a computer every day at their jobs. Yet I messed up so many times I can't even begin to count them. Crashing the computer, getting viruses, almost melting the processor, ect (didn't have too many forums in my childhood so that didn't apply to me). Thing is, I learned from my mistakes and now am majoring in computer programing at college.

So while my "failures" might have prevented me from getting this stupid liscense, in the real world it actually led me to my career path.

Besides, this is just another cop out idea for parents not wanting to deal with their kids. My parents sat down with me and helped me learn the interner, what to do and what not to do (usually after I managed to download several gigs of spam) but it was their concern that kept me on the right track. THAT is what should be taught, good parenting. Not punishing children who haven't been taught right from wrong.
 

MasterOfWorlds

New member
Oct 1, 2010
1,890
0
0
You're always going to have asshats out there that are happy or otherwise make something bad out to be something little or even funny. It doesn't matter if it's on the internet or not. Any little kid can stumble into their parents' bedside table and find a porn video. Your arguments would be valid if there weren't other examples of the same thing happening damn near everywhere else.

Also, you can create a fake ID to get a liscense, or for that matter, create a fake liscense. There are people out there that make fake IDs and whatnot for people. Sure, it's illegal, but it's not stopping them.