I think that the harder drugs are banned for a reason. I also think that the age limitations for alcohol and smoking are reasonable.
Is it even a question? I mean, it seems like a pretty obvious "no" to me.Iron Mal said:should someone else potentially suffer because of your actions or impaired judgement?
It was a rhetorical question (like you said, it's obvious that the answer is no), granted, I probably didn't show that very well but my point remains valid.Crimsane said:Is it even a question? I mean, it seems like a pretty obvious "no" to me.Iron Mal said:should someone else potentially suffer because of your actions or impaired judgement?
Aye, sorry. Didn't get much sleep, so I missed the rhetorical nature of it.Iron Mal said:It was a rhetorical question (like you said, it's obvious that the answer is no), granted, I probably didn't show that very well but my point remains valid.Crimsane said:Is it even a question? I mean, it seems like a pretty obvious "no" to me.Iron Mal said:should someone else potentially suffer because of your actions or impaired judgement?
I agree, plus I don't need another guy hopped up on Crystal Meth calling in airstrikes in my backyard... The US Government has trust issues they think the second they legalize any controlled substance everyone will instantly became a bloodthirsty anarchist... Followed by Communism (because that's so realistic...)wewontdie11 said:Some stuff should be allowed. Weed particularly. I don't see the logic in having tobacco and alcohol legalised when they are both far more dangerous than weed. To quote Bill Hicks, ?I have never seen two people on pot get in a fight because it is fucking IMPOSSIBLE. "Hey, buddy!" "Hey, what?" "Ummmmmmm...." End of argument.?.
Harder stuff like cocaine and speed should be kept illegal though. Those things are highly addictive and will fuck you up eventually.
I was interested in the last part of your point. What do you mean by that?khaimera said:I love this topic since I work in the addcition field. I for one think that all drugs should be legal. I could write a dissertation on the topic but will only pick out some of my favorite points.
1. Drug use will be prevalent no matter what the laws are, hence the war on drugs will always fail and waste billions of dollars. Its a part of human nature to alter consciousness.
All fair points, but none of which really make any solid reasons for the actual legalization of all drugs. What's the point? Making it easier to access them seems kind of stupid, to be honest. When's the last time you saw a coke/meth/heroin/whatever addict being a more productive member of society thanks to his habit? Never.khaimera said:I love this topic since I work in the addcition field. I for one think that all drugs should be legal. I could write a dissertation on the topic but will only pick out some of my favorite points.
1. Drug use will be prevalent no matter what the laws are, hence the war on drugs will always fail and waste billions of dollars. Its a part of human nature to alter consciousness.
2. People who have issues to begn with will behave badly whether drugs are involved are not, though drugs make it easier to do so.
3. Why isn't illegal to put everything harmful in your body, like drinking bleach.
4. The crime and drug link is based on correlation, not causation, and confounding variables
are responsible for the link.
No worries, happens to us all (I personally didn't take any offence anyway).Crimsane said:Aye, sorry. Didn't get much sleep, so I missed the rhetorical nature of it.
"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, privide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our prosperity, do ordain and establish this Constitution of the States of America."chiggerwood said:Is it right for a government to tell individuals what they can or cannot put into their own body's?