Catkid906 said:
cuddly_tomato said:
No. Waste of time and money.
Can we have a bit more detail please? Why is it a big waste of time and money?
Sure thing.
Get yourself a TV set, one of those that plugs into a standard aerial and can run on a car ciggarrete lighter. Drive for 5 hours in some random direction. Now take the worst indoor portable aerial you can find and try to watch something on TV.
Difficult?
Piss easy compared to SETI.
You have to point your telescope at the EXACT right point in the sky. We are not talking "to within a few degrees", we are talking about "to within 0.00000000001 degrees horizontal and 0.00000000001 degrees vertical". Now, let's assume you manage that. You have to hope that there is nothing in the way. Planets, stars, grit, asteroids, magnetic interference, black holes, and other things in the billllliiiiooooonnnnnsss of miles between here and there. Great, we have these two things perfect, and are pointing our little thingy at the alien world. Now we have a new problem - are we listening on the right frequency? Think back to that TV set, you have to get the right frequency to actually receive any signals. Otherwise you get nothing.
Yay! We have done all that. Now we face a new problem - are they broadcasting strongly enough? Or are those signals dissipating before they get here? Do they even have their sending equipment switched on?
No, SETI is a pure waste. looking for needle in a haystack the size of an ocean, and the worst is yet to come...
This needle looks just like all the hay. Let's assume that we did pick something up [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal]. Without any frame of reference or real knowledge of what we are looking for, just how useful would a detection be?