Poll: Sniper Rifle Satellite

Recommended Videos

ffxfriek

New member
Apr 3, 2008
2,070
0
0
Unreliable said:
Also, and most importantly:
Is this for a video game or real life?

If for a video game, then neato, go nuts, I'm sure its not any more ridiculous than a lot of guns in gaming.

In real life you have now weaponized space.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weaponization_of_space
This is not a good thing for the human race (I dont care if it IS on your side, the response to a weapon like this is to build up overwhelming nuclear missiles in retaliation to assure M.A.D. - because there is no way to fight back against a weapon like that except total destruction of the planet... this is quite literally madness)

madnesss.....THIS IS SPARTA!!!

but in all seriousness its true we will blow ourselves to hell with nukes and weapons in space. how much more fun cant it get.
 

nick_knack

New member
Jul 16, 2008
341
0
0
Well, first off, this is a gaming site not a modeling site. For that you will want to go to SFM there you will find what you are looking for.

Other than that, go to it! It sounds cool, and I cannot wait to see it.
 

Finnboghi

New member
Oct 23, 2008
338
0
0
Ignore what everyone else is saying - stay away from video tutorials!

I've never once found one that was anything more than time-wasting garbage.

Try here [http://www.tutorialized.com/tutorials/3DS-MAX/1] for some helpful text-and-picture tutorials (they'll teach you a lot more effectively).

I've been using Max for 4 years now, and although I'm not an expert, I've made a few good-looking things.

Maya is good, but whichever you learn first is what you're going to stick with.

Despite being made (currently) by the same company (Autodesk, the maker of Maya, bought 3DS Max from Discreet), they are extremely different in their interface, technology, and overall power.

If you want to decide which you want before you start, then go with this as a rough rule; Maya is easier to learn, and much easier to master, but once you do, there's nothing more you can do with it.

Max on the other hand is very difficult to learn, and even when you think you've mastered it years later, there's always something new for you to learn.

So, basically, Maya is easy to learn but more limited, Max is hard to learn, but is a lot more powerful.

As for the idea, it would be really cool for a game, but unfortunately it would never work in reality.

Wind, along with a host of other factors, would influence targeting, firing, and successful engaging of a given target, making it physically impossible for this to be an effective weapon.

A few of these would be:
[ul][li]Changing air currents[/li]
[li]Refraction of light off the outer atmosphere (making accurate targeting impossible)[/li]
[li]The lack of stability of a falling bullet, which would cause it to veer horribly off course[/li]
[li]Friction from drag, which would melt any metal (and possibly diamond - it only takes 4000°C)[/li]
[/ul]

P.S. If you want a really interesting example of what Max can do, look for a tutorial about using missiles to shoot teapots - the smoke and tracking effects are absolutely stunning.
 

Zahri

New member
Dec 15, 2008
1,017
0
0
Finnboghi said:
Ignore what everyone else is saying - stay away from video tutorials!

I've never once found one that was anything more than time-wasting garbage.

Try here [http://www.tutorialized.com/tutorials/3DS-MAX/1] for some helpful text-and-picture tutorials (they'll teach you a lot more effectively).

I've been using Max for 4 years now, and although I'm not an expert, I've made a few good-looking things.

Maya is good, but whichever you learn first is what you're going to stick with.

Despite being made (currently) by the same company (Autodesk, the maker of Maya, bought 3DS Max from Discreet), they are extremely different in their interface, technology, and overall power.

If you want to decide which you want before you start, then go with this as a rough rule; Maya is easier to learn, and much easier to master, but once you do, there's nothing more you can do with it.

Max on the other hand is very difficult to learn, and even when you think you've mastered it years later, there's always something new for you to learn.

So, basically, Maya is easy to learn but more limited, Max is hard to learn, but is a lot more powerful.

As for the idea, it would be really cool for a game, but unfortunately it would never work in reality.

Wind, along with a host of other factors, would influence targeting, firing, and successful engaging of a given target, making it physically impossible for this to be an effective weapon.

A few of these would be:
[ul][li]Changing air currents[/li]
[li]Refraction of light off the outer atmosphere (making accurate targeting impossible)[/li]
[li]The lack of stability of a falling bullet, which would cause it to veer horribly off course[/li]
[li]Friction from drag, which would melt any metal (and possibly diamond - it only takes 4000°C)[/li]
[/ul]

P.S. If you want a really interesting example of what Max can do, look for a tutorial about using missiles to shoot teapots - the smoke and tracking effects are absolutely stunning.
Thank you =D

starting out... i made this



Tis a mushroom :D
 

manaman

New member
Sep 2, 2007
3,218
0
0
Unreliable said:
Also, and most importantly:
Is this for a video game or real life?

If for a video game, then neato, go nuts, I'm sure its not any more ridiculous than a lot of guns in gaming.

In real life you have now weaponized space.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weaponization_of_space
This is not a good thing for the human race (I dont care if it IS on your side, the response to a weapon like this is to build up overwhelming nuclear missiles in retaliation to assure M.A.D. - because there is no way to fight back against a weapon like that except total destruction of the planet... this is quite literally madness)
Hot air balloons were lofted by Napoleon, during the American Civil War, and the first World War to observe troop movements.

That line came straight from the wiki page you cited. That there is the main reason why wiki is not to be trusted. It might have meant balloons where used by Napoleon and during the American Civil War, but that is not how it reads. Napoleon died in 1821 in case anyone wants to know. The civil war started in the 1861.

Also, nukes in space sounds fun. Cause there would be nothing better then an orbital missile platform that malfunctions, enters the atmosphere, burns up and rains down radioactive material across the world. Also who in their right mind wants to go off and do maintenance on an orbital death station? Who wants to pay the upkeep... wait what was all that X project money spent on?
 

Jenkins

New member
Dec 4, 2007
1,091
0
0
masterjiji said:
a satellite that snipes... sounds both impractical and just ridiculous. i hate to shit all over your great-idea party like the master asshole i am, but if you want to put a .50 cal round in someone's head, much less a satellite-sniper-rifle-sized round, just go do it yourself. also, my physics nerd side kicks in here and wonders about bullet speed to reach the target in a set amount of time, burning up on atmospheric entry, etc.

in short, a potentially good idea, but flawed. at least, in my opinion.
well, it could be a snipe via Kinetic strike, altho that would not be sniping, it would be total decimation.
 

Zahri

New member
Dec 15, 2008
1,017
0
0
manaman said:
Unreliable said:
Also, and most importantly:
Is this for a video game or real life?

If for a video game, then neato, go nuts, I'm sure its not any more ridiculous than a lot of guns in gaming.

In real life you have now weaponized space.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weaponization_of_space
This is not a good thing for the human race (I dont care if it IS on your side, the response to a weapon like this is to build up overwhelming nuclear missiles in retaliation to assure M.A.D. - because there is no way to fight back against a weapon like that except total destruction of the planet... this is quite literally madness)
Hot air balloons were lofted by Napoleon, during the American Civil War, and the first World War to observe troop movements.

That line came straight from the wiki page you cited. That there is the main reason why wiki is not to be trusted. It might have meant balloons where used by Napoleon and during the American Civil War, but that is not how it reads. Napoleon died in 1821 in case anyone wants to know. The civil war started in the 1861.

Also, nukes in space sounds fun. Cause there would be nothing better then an orbital missile platform that malfunctions, enters the atmosphere, burns up and rains down radioactive material across the world. Also who in their right mind wants to go off and do maintenance on an orbital death station? Who wants to pay the upkeep... wait what was all that X project money spent on?
Like i said, last resort! xD Anyways, as impractical as it is, it would be just as badass if it worked