Fastest way to kill a monster is to be monster. That is how you win wars by being the most brutal son of a ***** not in measured violence. This was how the Civil War was finally won and this was how WW2 was won and guess what in the end it saved lives on both sides.immovablemover said:I would do my damnedest to take him Alive, with minimal harm done to him. If not taking the shot meant a capture opportunity in the future I would not take the shot.
If there was an immediate and pressing need to be lethal I would do so, but I would attempt to make it as clean, efficient and as suffering-free as I could.
I have no intention of becoming a monster whilst trying to fight them. It is a shame the same cannot be said for a good portion of the people in this thread.
There was no true context for that quote to begin with. When something like that is said, even with a topic like this, it's still not valid in said discussion.Yopaz said:Quoting out of context just to get it out of context so you can twist it to mean what you mean doesn't mean you made a valid point.
Isn't it more ignorant to say that American first and foremost refers to a U.S. citizen? Because claiming that means that you are being ignorant to the 24 countries in the American Continents.artanis_neravar said:American will always refer to citizens of the United States first and foremost, so your South American comment is ignorant and only intended to grief the person you quoted.
The best way to win a war is to dehumanize your enemy. Our soldiers can not do what they need to do if they are constantly reminded that the people they are shooting have family'sspectrenihlus said:Fastest way to kill a monster is to be monster. That is how you win wars by being the most brutal son of a ***** not in measured violence. This was how the Civil War was finally won and this was how WW2 was won and guess what in the end it saved lives on both sides.immovablemover said:I would do my damnedest to take him Alive, with minimal harm done to him. If not taking the shot meant a capture opportunity in the future I would not take the shot.
If there was an immediate and pressing need to be lethal I would do so, but I would attempt to make it as clean, efficient and as suffering-free as I could.
I have no intention of becoming a monster whilst trying to fight them. It is a shame the same cannot be said for a good portion of the people in this thread.
It is country before continent. People from France are French before they are European, Citizens of Brazil are Brazilian before they are South American, and citizens of the US are American Before they are North American.RanD00M said:Isn't it more ignorant to say that American first and foremost refers to a U.S. citizen? Because claiming that means that you are being ignorant to the 24 countries in the American Continents.artanis_neravar said:American will always refer to citizens of the United States first and foremost, so your South American comment is ignorant and only intended to grief the person you quoted.
Second of all show me the official guideline to what American mean first and foremost. And please don't present one that was pulled out of your ass.
Okay, so you got me there. But does that mean that I am personally not allowed to use the second one first and foremost. And does that mean that just because that it has been used for some number of years now that it can't be changed? No, and I am not one to call yanks Americans. I rather call yanks U.S. Citizens or Yanks.artanis_neravar said:Snip