Poll: So, Bin Laden, you give a shit?

Recommended Videos

Roroshi14

New member
Dec 3, 2009
193
0
0
I don't really care as much as I did a few years ago, but now a day I don't really care. I am happy he is dead. It's a good thing, I hope. But the retaliation and inspiration it will give the rest of the Tali ban might be to much.
 

crop52

New member
Mar 16, 2011
314
0
0
this doesn't change much, but i still give a shit,
i'm sure his underlings looked up to him, and his death will:

A:make everything worse as terrorist go crazy over it,
B:hurt terrorist morale,

*crossing fingers* come on B!
 

Snake Plissken

New member
Jul 30, 2010
1,375
0
0
I'm confused...does the poll relate to the title of the thread, or to your statement in the post? In any case, yes, I give a shit and, no, I don't think it will change anything.

Perhaps you should clarify what the poll is actually polling us about.
 

thecoreyhlltt

New member
Jul 12, 2010
531
0
0
i don't that it changes anything, but hey two down, one to go!
America, FUCK YEAH! coming again to save the mother fucking day-yeah. America, FUCK YEAH!! Freedom is the only way.
W00T
 

Warforger

New member
Apr 24, 2010
641
0
0
I'm guessing the main reason people don't seem to care as much about his death as they would have say 10 years ago is because he and Al-Qaeda haven't really been in the news that much, in fact they've became a sort of a joke at this point, in fact I bet that before Bin Laden died the only news reports on it was members no one heard of getting killed.

sethzard said:
Innegativeion said:
sethzard said:
The 'head' of the 'fish' has been cut off, unless a new one is put on soon then the whole 'fish' will rot. Without the analogy, if a new leader isn't found soon then al'quada will disband.
I would think Al'quada has SOME sort of hierarchy.
They probably do, but if the new head doesn't establish themselves soon then they won't have the kind of power or respect they need.
Al-Qaeda isn't a standing government, it's a loose organization that does terrorist attacks, Bin Laden wasn't a commander was much as he was a sort of say Karl Marx to Al-Qaeda if they were Communists, while he outlined their ideal's and is a figurehead, he didn't say have any direct command as in he was too valuable to risk being the central command by the time he was attacked. In fact in terms of 9/11 he didn't plan it he just gave them his approval.
 

cthulhumythos

New member
Aug 28, 2009
637
0
0
while i'm not going to say something stupid like "i can rest easy now", i am going to say this: i can breath a sigh of relief. sure, he's just one guy, but we wasted hella time and money trying to kill 'em. sure it was nearly a total waste, but now that waste will (i really hope) stop. and besides, despite the fact that we're completely and utterly in there for the oil, we have one less reason to not be pissed that we're still in there. who knows, maybe this might speed up the pulling out process.

*please note that the above opinion is that of an ignorant idealist.
 

smallthemouse

New member
Feb 21, 2011
117
0
0
Just because it didn't affect you directly it doesn't mean 9/11 was insignificant. For a lot of people, getting him provided at least some kind of satisfaction after ten years of seemingly pointless war.

Also I'm glad we have so many terrorism/political analysts on the escapist. How do you know what affect his death will have? Of course he is going to be a martyr to some degree, but don't you think that if terrorists could have done something, they would have done it by now, after 10 years? If President Obama were to be assassinated by a terrorist organization today, don't you think that would give Americans some pause? It's not a simple matter of "oh well someone will replace him so it doesn't matter, apathy is c00l."
 

Grunt_Man11

New member
Mar 15, 2011
250
0
0
Kingsman said:
Verlander said:
Was that moral boost worth the 14,000 to 34,00 (depending on report) civilian deaths? That is, death, end of life, nothing, nada. Was that boost worth the 7,000 + US soldiers who died?

I'm not saying it's all been for nothing, but it's a hollow victory at best. If you think a brief economic surge is going to make up for that, you're mistaken. He's dead, and it all still happened. End.
I get really tired of reading this bleeding heart argument.
Plus, bleeding heart arguments like these do more to make the deaths of all those soldiers seem in vain than anything else.

This is the leader and founder of the biggest terrorist organization, not some simple low ranking officer or something. This man was responsible for countless deaths, as well as ruining the image of an entire religion and culture.

His death is not a hollow victory, and claiming it is disrespects all those that made the ultimate sacrifice for this moment. Those they do should be ashamed of themselves.
 

Jaric93

New member
May 2, 2011
48
0
0
All I can see now is a martyr who has basicly succeeded in brainwashing an entire generation. The problem is I think he was probably a poster boy and were no nearer to stopping the source of the problem.
 

Kathinka

New member
Jan 17, 2010
1,141
0
0
joebear15 said:
Kathinka said:
well, considered that he was less of a threat for world piece then any u.s.-president, i don't really care. those guys should be brought to an international tribunal and hung up high.
how would you accomplish that without war? People make these statments and it makes me happy and allows people to know that you can be both anti america and stupid.
unfortunately it can not be accomplished. and i said nowhere that it ever would. it would just be desirable and in the best interest of the world. i suggest you invest more time reading correctly before further insults and (failed) attempts of wit. :)
 
Sep 17, 2009
2,851
0
0
gellert1984 said:
easternflame said:
Look it's a fairly simple question, he's dead now, so do you think it changes anything? If it does, why? and if not, why?
Also, do you think it actually changes anything for the families of the people who died in 9/11?
So please give your insight on this situation.
I dont care that he's dead but now he's a martyr, more trrrists will be signing up for the cause.
You don't really know how Muslim Fundamentalism works now do you?

He was killed in a firefight, he didn't surrender his body to the cause of spreading Islam, he isn't getting his 72 virgins and etc.

He will not be a martyr. I don't know why you would think that.

OT: Yea I care. A lot of families have closure now. The head of a terrorist organization is dead. This isn't solely a US victory, this is a world victory. But that being said his death should not be celebrated.
 

nima55

Paladin of Traffic Law
Nov 14, 2010
214
0
0
As a Canadian, I'm happy that we finally got him, But I'm not as overcome with joy as I assume some Americans might be.
 
Sep 17, 2009
2,851
0
0
flying_whimsy said:
Just like Hitler wasn't actually responsible for the holocaust because he just organized it. By your logic no leader is actually accountable for anything.
Actually Hitler was directly responsible for part of the Holocaust. His signature is on the document that ordered the rounding up and murdering of the mentally handicapped, but after political backlash he had his underlings sign all the rest of the papers. But he was basically holding their hands as they gripped the pens that signed the death notices.


zelda2fanboy said:
He didn't even really commit 9/11, he just organized it. I believe the 19 people responsible died almost 10 years ago. Credit where credit is due, people.
Are you saying we should give credit to the terrorists that crashed the planes into the WTC? Wow.

Also, you don't have to pull the trigger to be directly responsible.
 
Sep 17, 2009
2,851
0
0
trooperpaul said:
Hooray! It only took us 10 years to find a diabetic architect in a mansion!
People say he was the architect behind 9/11, but the only thing he was an architect of was a couple of apartments in Baghdad. The US launched a ten-year manhunt for this guy in the first place because he said "Sucks to be You".
Are you serious?

You know that this isn't just a US victory right?

And he was the head of a major terrorist organization.

Man people are so US-centric.
 

Fidelias

New member
Nov 30, 2009
1,406
0
0
It's not going to change anything, but I'm still happy the son of a ***** is dead.
 

Rottweiler

New member
Jan 20, 2008
258
0
0
So here we are...a Forum where the death of a world-wide terrorism Icon is 'meh' but your favorite Game Server goes down for more than two days and it's time to panic and sue.

Where every mistake made by a certain country...which shall remain nameless (USA)...is pointed out, but the failings, human rights violations, and outright abominations which happen every day in other countries is swept under the rug and ignored. Where all of terrorism is blamed on a *pretty recent* invasion (of course, the Taliban and Al Qaeda never existed before the invasion of Iraq, right) and privileged, never lived in a country where human rights don't exist posters complain but do nothing to actually *help*.

Apparently, no one reads history, or they use the 'but winners write history so I will only accept the history which supports my preconceived notions' excuse, and fails to see certain things:

Terrorism is guerrilla warfare. It is hide-in-the-dark, use children to carry bombs, make cheap propaganda claims while torturing our own people because the media is our collective ***** guerrilla warfare.

It is also based on tribal culture and personal charisma. Warlords and guerrilla leaders count on reputation and charisma to lead and recruit. Osama Bin Laden has been very much a hero and icon for terrorists everywhere, and every day he survived he helped the terrorist's cause. Now that he's dead, a major figure of awe and admiration is gone (not to mention he wasn't bad at planning attacks, either) and that is a good thing.
 

Risingblade

New member
Mar 15, 2010
2,893
0
0
Verlander said:
Was that moral boost worth the 14,000 to 34,00 (depending on report) civilian deaths? That is, death, end of life, nothing, nada. Was that boost worth the 7,000 + US soldiers who died?

I'm not saying it's all been for nothing, but it's a hollow victory at best. If you think a brief economic surge is going to make up for that, you're mistaken. He's dead, and it all still happened. End.
Yes