So I've always been a big fan of the Sci Fi FPS and of course relish the idea of using inventive weapons, usually alien weapons. However recently a question has popped into my brain, in regards to the logical result of what would happen if an alien was shot by his own technology. For a while I always followed 'Halo reflexes' and assumed this meant that the alien was naturally vulnerable to this weapon... but then I played Republic Commando and that made the assumption that never is a weapon more useless then when it is fired on it's makers. This created a dilema that first I never understood but now I think I'm getting it.. I'll explain. Let's just say this is a Bio Gun or something, but in my mind there are two possibilities. Either:
A.
The weapon made by the aliens is more effective against them as it was at one point made by them to kill each other so therefore it would be concievable that they would be weaker because of it.
B.
These aliens may well have lived through this weapon for many years and thus adapted to it and developed a tolerance for the weapons effects or know how to treat the wounds so that means a weapon they are unused to would be more effective against them.
Which of the two do you think is more likely, I just thought this would make for decent conversation which is always on my mind when I make threads.
A.
The weapon made by the aliens is more effective against them as it was at one point made by them to kill each other so therefore it would be concievable that they would be weaker because of it.
B.
These aliens may well have lived through this weapon for many years and thus adapted to it and developed a tolerance for the weapons effects or know how to treat the wounds so that means a weapon they are unused to would be more effective against them.
Which of the two do you think is more likely, I just thought this would make for decent conversation which is always on my mind when I make threads.