Rawberry101 said:
Since when has ESPN been dumping on the PAC-12? I always thought that with how good the Californian teams have been been in the past it was fairly well regarded.
Also, I curious how you reacted to the news that The Melk man got caught with steroids.
ESPN, to me, always seems to be interested in conferences that have powerhouse teams with a history of winning. Since USC had been flagging in strength for the past few years it seemed like the PAC-12 wasn't getting nearly as much attention as the SEC, Big 12, or Big 10. Oregon was great but they haven't been historically great so it seemed like most of the pundits didn't really give them much time or consideration relative to say LSU or Oklahoma. Although part of that was the loss to LSU as far as last year went.
But from a Stanford fan perspective, the sports media in general ignored us for the most part. Every week my dad and I would eagerly watch the BCS standings and would repeatedly sigh as teams of questionable records move ahead purely because of their conference affiliation. Also, the snubbing of Andrew Luck, not to mention Toby Gerhart, by the Heisman voters was a tough pill to swallow.
And Melky Cabrera...I was saddened by the news but it makes sense. Spikes in performance like that need to be closely monitored nowadays.