I played the first Paper Mario not too long after it first came out and I liked it a lot.
Now, so many years later, I'm taking a crack at the SNES classic Super Mario RPG.
So far, well...it seems too similar to Paper Mario to be super interesting. The things that stand out as different are for the worse, such as how in Paper Mario the second-to-second gameplay, whether you're in battle or out of battle, moved along at a very brisk pace. SMRPG feels slow and clunky in comparison. I want to know if this game is still worth playing. I've Googled other threads on other sites but when people talk about this topic they don't really go into WHY they like one game over the other.
So, if you wouldn't mind enlightening me, what is it that you like about either (ideally both) game(s)? The writing, the humor, the characters? If you've played both, which one has better writing, better humor, and/or better characters?
Now, so many years later, I'm taking a crack at the SNES classic Super Mario RPG.
So far, well...it seems too similar to Paper Mario to be super interesting. The things that stand out as different are for the worse, such as how in Paper Mario the second-to-second gameplay, whether you're in battle or out of battle, moved along at a very brisk pace. SMRPG feels slow and clunky in comparison. I want to know if this game is still worth playing. I've Googled other threads on other sites but when people talk about this topic they don't really go into WHY they like one game over the other.
So, if you wouldn't mind enlightening me, what is it that you like about either (ideally both) game(s)? The writing, the humor, the characters? If you've played both, which one has better writing, better humor, and/or better characters?