The T-1000 was most likely lacking in creative thinking there. AI like any portable machine could have has to work within it's own programing. Besides that that T-1000 has plainly shown and painfully limited range over the action of it's liquid metal body, and it's even explained that way. So throwing a sharp projectile made of it self might have had unpredictable results. Either way the T-1000 is shown to have a priority of keeping it self in a single piece. Otherwise it could have easily just booby trapped a hall with bits of it self and skewered everyone from every direction. It's a machine and lacks the creative thought process of humans, or even Skynet for that matter. It can only work with in the set parameters, intentional separation is probably a variable it can't compute.Tuesday Night Fever said:Just because it squeezed slowly doesn't mean it could have squeezed any faster. If your car tops out at 100mph, it's not going to move any faster than that just because you think it "should be able to." As far as we know it did what it was capable of doing.Ambient_Malice said:Yea, but it squeezed itself REALLY SLOWLY through the bars when logically it could have flung a sharp piece of itself through the bars. In fact, there was no reason for T-1000 to grab onto the back of the car with blades when it could easily liquify and move up into the car.
It could have hidden inside her orange juice and stabbed her from the inside. (Yes, I know - that would be a really short movie.)
Also, we have no idea whether or not it actually could have flung part of itself with the velocity needed to kill - we've never seen the T-1000 using pieces of itself as projectiles, other than "Uncle Bob" saying that it can't create propellent. So, logically, the best it could do would be to throw part of itself using its physical strength, and it better have one hell of a Pitcher's arm, because that was a very long hallway.
Just because you say it could "easily" liquify and move up the car doesn't mean that it can. That's a capability that, again, we as an audience have no idea whether or not it actually possesses.
Your arguments here are based on hypothetical capabilities of a machine which we, the viewers, aren't privy to. My argument with regard to the TX is that it simply failed to seize an opportunity. An infiltrator/assassin that intentionally exposes itself before it gets the chance to eliminate its target, giving its target a chance to escape, is an infiltrator/assassin that sucks at its job - regardless of whether it's a machine or a person.
Kyle Reese: "Listen, and understand. That terminator is out there. It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, unless it gets an opportunity to mug for the camera for a SWEET trailer shot, until you are dead."
As for flowing up into the car? Well physics says that the wind would have torn it apart if it liquified at such high speed.
I'd wager a guess that the T-1000 has a very small CPU, and very little storage space. As it's made mostly of it's liquid metal larger components would risk getting heavily damaged when it's hit by say, a shotgun slug. Smaller ones could be anywhere within it's body to mitigate the potential of damage. The T-800 on the other hand is heavily armoured with plenty of space for larger more complex components, so it's learning computer is possible due to the space and the protection available. So I'd say while the T-1000 is more advanced as a killing machine, the T-800 is still more advanced as a general purpose unit, due to having a better computer.