Yeah warfare changed alot since thenGHMonkey said:dude, WWII? we did not lose that and there was a draft i am pretty damn certainjamesworkshop said:In reality nobody likes the draft being shot at isn't fun
it basically mean the war is already lost
sending huge waves to go and get killed doesn't help the economy
military personal hate conscripts because they are completly unreliable and destroy morale created by the elitism of military forces and those who passed the training to join
Might as well fight in the draft death in battle is preferable to being slaughterd when the enemy invade and kill everyone
Good point well expressed Rolling Thunder.Rolling Thunder said:Max, what I'm saying is that, well, fighting for the status quo, in certain scenarios, is fighting in your own selfinterest. You would not like to live under an authoritarian government, and neither would I. And, as intelligent and dangerous as we both were, two, or even two hundred, or twenty thousand such men aren't going to make a difference as individuals. It was only at war, where those twenty thousand who didn't heed the call, that we could have made a difference.
It did for the Vietnam War, what makes you think they wouldn't bring out the draft if a war actually threatened the United States? I think they would be quick to arm the populace to stop those communist/terrorist bastards, if need be.Radeonx said:No.
But the draft won't happen in America.
Ever.
An entirely valid and reasonable point.MaxTheReaper said:Fair enough.Rolling Thunder said:snip
My original point (Well, one of my older ones, anyway,) though, still stands: Pressing people into service is a really excellent way to embitter people who you just taught to kill, and since the enemy isn't the one who just took however many years of their life away, "reason" and "logic" would probably not be high on the list of things to use while considering their next move.