Yay! Somebody are gets it!Altorin said:How do "Magnetic Turbines" work?
aren't all turbines Magnetic? isn't the the properties of electromagnetism that make turbines work at all?
This whole thread is a joke to begin with.
Yay! Somebody are gets it!Altorin said:How do "Magnetic Turbines" work?
aren't all turbines Magnetic? isn't the the properties of electromagnetism that make turbines work at all?
This whole thread is a joke to begin with.
like most chemistry class dropouts the first thing he probably thought of was nitroglycerin.LoopyDood said:Nitrogen is most of what makes up Earth's atmosphere... You know, the air? It's not flammable or explosive at all.shadowstriker86 said:Nitrogen - Even More Prone to Explosion
And speaking as an easily agreeable chap who knows absolutely nothing about the aformentioned subject, I second that, if only to avoid making more of a fool than I already have. Plus there was no way I WASN'T picking Mr. Fusion. It can produce 1.21 gigawatts from only a banana peel, some soda, and some other crap.amazinglettera said:Sorry, but speaking as a licensed radiological technologist, anything involving ionizing radiation, those are dangerous forms of electromagnetic radiation and don't do anything good as forms of electricity.
I hate to break it to you, but the energy released through NO[sub]2[/sub] (and every other exothermic chemical reaction) comes from energy that was stored in the molecule when it was formed.shadowstriker86 said:I meant the Nitrogen as in Nitrous Oxide, the special boost tey puts in teh cars to makes dem go fasterLoopyDood said:Nitrogen is most of what makes up Earth's atmosphere... You know, the air? It's not flammable or explosive at all.shadowstriker86 said:Nitrogen - Even More Prone to Explosion
Fission is totally out of the question. To meet worldwide energy demands, you would need to build a new plant every 4 days for 20 years. Do you know how long it takes to build a nuclear power station and how much the buggers cost?Wardog13 said:For the foreseeable? Nuclear Fission. In say, 50 years? Fusion hopefully.
Hydrogen is far, far more dangerous than petrol. Contrary to what Hollywood retards would have you believe, cars do not just explode. The tank has to be heated up for a long time before it will go off, and even then, it's the pressure causing the explosion, with a secondary explosion caused by vaporized petrol. The tanks is much more likely the simply split and allow the petrol to leak out.Jedoro said:Hydrogen.
Cars are prone to explosions with a flame around, anyways, and when the exhaust will be water, why not?
See, you tell me to imagine it, and now I want hydrogen even more so I could have the off-chance of seeing cars explode on an average day.ARM02 said:Hydrogen is far, far more dangerous than petrol. Contrary to what Hollywood retards would have you believe, cars do not just explode. The tank has to be heated up for a long time before it will go off, and even then, it's the pressure causing the explosion, with a secondary explosion caused by vaporized petrol. The tanks is much more likely the simply split and allow the petrol to leak out.Jedoro said:Hydrogen.
Cars are prone to explosions with a flame around, anyways, and when the exhaust will be water, why not?
If a hydrogen tank got cracked, you would get a jet of hydrogen gas, which would be extremely likely to ingnite. Imagine a 10 metre jet of fire erupting from the bonnet of the car and continuing to burn for half an hour.