"Woman" is fine. "Person" is good, and my preferred for anyone because it is non-gendered. I know a lot of people who aren't men or women, so neither applies.GotMalkAvian said:So, what pronoun would you like to be applied to you? I sense that "dude" probably wouldn't sit well with you. "Human female?" "Person?" You didn't offer any non-offensive suggestions, merely that "girl" and "chick" are unacceptable.
I agree with a lot of what you said about meaning and connotation, but allow me to direct that back at you: What if a term like "chick" is used in a completely affectionate way that in no way is meant to insult a woman's intelligence?
Hell, my fiancee calls me "wookiee." Now, this is referring to a fictional alien, known for being large, shaggy, savage, uncivilized, tree-dwelling, and communicating entirely through grunts and roars. Not exactly a noble list of traits. Under certain circumstances, it would be entirely reasonable to be offended by this. However, since she uses the term as an affectionate nickname, I take no issue with it.
Sometimes, words get divorced from their original meanings and take on new meanings over time. Hell, how many of us label ourselves as "geeks" these days?
As for as an affectionate term, I can't say I'm a fan either. The thing about terms of endearment that are actually endearing is that they're personal, they're something generally more unique than "chick". Then again, I'm one who loathes the use of "Babe" and "Baby" etc. as terms of endearment because I find them saccharin and condescending. Within relationships words like this work themselves out. If someone wishes to use it in a relationship, who am I to say they're wrong? People use "Pumpkin", "Snookims", "sunshine" and many others I find distasteful. In their relationship, it's up to them, because I imagine that it's a mutually acceptable term between the partners as in yours.
It's the general use in reference to females that I'm opposed to. Someone who doesn't know me calling me a chick is a short road to my disliking them for all the connotations I've said before. Habit is no excuse. "******" has been a habit in the past, "fag" and "gay" are used now. The passing of these terms into popular habitual slang is a microaggression, something small which none the less adds a subtle psychological sense of otherness, of isolation. Imagine if the derogatory term for hetrosexuals, "Breeders" became something popular used to a) put down things disliked and b) put down those who choose to have families. Of course this won't happen, heterosexuals are in the majority, but it would be a microaggression none the less.
I know well that words change their meanings. However, as we still use "chick" to refer to juvenile birds this does not apply.