kinda... but I usually have other reasons to back it up.
take Inception for example. now I didn't HATE this movie, I just hated how everyone REACTED to it. all of the wannabe film-snobs were happily tounging the movie's balls, saying how "original" (it wasn't) and "deep" (it wasn't) it was. I didn't care about any of the characters (except for Michael Caine, Leonardo DiCaprio, and Arthur, they were kinda cool), I saw the "twist" coming a MILE away, the whole thing was just too overcomplicated, etc. It could have been a MUCH better movie if it focused less on being clever and more on being a movie. now there ARE some legitimately clever things about it (the "BUAAAAMMMM" music is the song they wake up to slowed down, the first letters of the main characters' names spells out DREAMS, etc.), but I thought it was just okay. not amazing, not terrible, just alright.
and yet, this perfectly adequate movie gets praised as the most amazing thing ever, and anyone who doesn't think so just "didn't get it".
THAT'S what pissed me off.
or Justin Bieber, as another example. his music is TERRIBLE. he is a spoiled BRAT. people have said this about him (he pissed off EVERYONE on the set of CSI, he was almost kicked off of an airplane for acting like a spoiled child, he donates NOTHING to Japan, and is still praised as this talented little angel, etc.). It's just annoying to me that standards of what is "good" have fallen so low nowadays.
so yeah, I've hated things for being popular, but I would hate them even if they weren't popular, so I feel it's not as much a dipshit-hipster-Hot Topic move on my part.