Poll: This spambot got me thinking.

[Biosophilogical]

Okay, so some of you have so far seen a thread by some weird spambot. Now don't get me wrong, I agree with some/most of the Escapians' sentiments*, but it did get me thinking. What do the members of the escapist *tips hat in acknowledgement* find sexier in their preferred sex? The 'perfect' bare chest or the 'perfect' bare back. By perfect I mean, 'the best you can imagine'.

For any bisexuals/asexuals or people too young/inexperienced/unsure to have a specific preference, there are options for you too.

Okay. I hope my poll is fairly straight forward. Basically you find your preference (men/women/no preference) and pick whether you find that sex's back or chest to be more attractive under optimal conditions.

*Namely to kill it with fire

 

[sir.rutthed]

Bare back is pretty sexy. For me it's all about what you can't see; the anticipation.

 

[Phlakes]

Heterosexual male here (what a surprise), and I've never really thought much of backs. A bit, but not much.

 

[onewheeled]

I have to go with a female with the perfect chest.

While I do appreciate the anticipation of a bare back, you know it's all just leading up to the big reveal. And really, would the perfect chest ever get boring?

 

[crudus]

Male, into girls. I vote perfect chest. It is just more fun to play with than a bare back, period.

 

[ImperialSunlight]

I like men's pectorals ^^;
Murrrrrr......

Anyway, yes, chest on males, definately.

 

[boondoggler23]

I love a sexy soft back of a really thin cute girl

 

[JezebelinHell]

As a female with an extremely sensitive back, I would like to suggest not neglecting it just because you prefer other areas. I guess I could be the only one that finds light tickling highly exciting but I am gonna bet that I am not. Massages are great as well. I also suggest learning how to do them right. On occassion (not always) they can work wonders on the whole "I am really not in the mood." Life is stressful, get used to it. Use them unselfishly and they will work better.

I cannot pick back or chest on a guy, they are equally interesting.

 

[Snugglebunny]

Men with perfect backs. Firstly, because a well toned body looks wonderful from almost any angle, and the back just shows that off the best I think, but mostly because man-nipples kind of freak me out. A bunch.

What are they even doing there? They don't need them. Ew.

 

[chuckman1]

I like women and I vote boobs

 

[TiloXofXTanto]

Why is their no "frankly my dear I don't give a damn" option?
Because, frankly, I don't give a damn.

 

[Febel]

First of all I appreciate the asexual options. First time someone here has catered to me so thanks.

Anyway I like the look of a women's back more than her chest, although if it were an option:
legs legs legs legs legs!

 

[Erana]

...I like to draw chests?
As an asexual, I don't really have a thing for that what-nots, but the chest is much more enjoyable for me when drawing from life.
Its just so satisfying- with both men and women, its so recognizable, so sensual, and it alone can suggest to the viewer what the rest of the body is doing and how the person feels.

Backs are nice and all, but they're not as consistently interesting, and certain poses can leave them a bit ambiguous.

 

[thick doona]

First of all I appreciate the asexual options. First time someone here has catered to me so thanks.

Anyway I like the look of a women's back more than her chest, although if it were an option:
legs legs legs legs legs!

Wait, asexual? I'd be grateful if you explained this to me.

 

[Febel]

First of all I appreciate the asexual options. First time someone here has catered to me so thanks.

Anyway I like the look of a women's back more than her chest, although if it were an option:
legs legs legs legs legs!

Wait, asexual? I'd be grateful if you explained this to me.

The short of it is, in my case, I appreciate men and women aesthetically but I've never had any interest whatsoever in sticking anything of mine into anything of their. Ever.

 

[arsenicCatnip]

Mm, there is very little quite as sexy as a strong male back. The angles and lines are just perfect.

(Plus scratching my boyfriend's back makes him make little happy noises, and it's just the cutest thing ever )

 

[McMullen]

Between back or chest... well... I don't know. If a woman's navel were an option though, I'd choose that without even needing to think about it.

 

[n00beffect]

No prefferance what-so-ever. Or rather, perfect back AND chest. Yes, I know, pretentious, but hey, we all have to have our standarts, right? But to be honest, to me there are other parts of a female that are more important than just the back or the chest. I don't know what it is with most hetero males, but just the sight of 'chest' or 'back' doesn't really stimulate me that much if the face of said girl resembles something close to a swordfish, i.e. if she's ugly. I wouldn't care less of she had a perfect body, if her face isn't even slightly attractive - no go, jo..ette(?!)

 

[thick doona]

First of all I appreciate the asexual options. First time someone here has catered to me so thanks.

Anyway I like the look of a women's back more than her chest, although if it were an option:
legs legs legs legs legs!

Wait, asexual? I'd be grateful if you explained this to me.

The short of it is, in my case, I appreciate men and women aesthetically but I've never had any interest whatsoever in sticking anything of mine into anything of their. Ever.

Well this is going to be a bit of a personal question but I've never heard of "asexual" before so you've peeked my interest. Do you masturbate/get aroused? I understand if you don't want to answer.

 

[templargunman]

You forgot the option where breasts and butt don't matter too much. For me, a girl needs an attractive face, followed by an attractive overall body shape (not fat, for example), and then breasts and ass kind of follow that. I'd definitely be interested in a girl with small tits or a flat ass, but I still notice those things when I see them. I'm still a guy, if I see big breasts my brain is obviously going to yell "big titties!" at me.

First of all I appreciate the asexual options. First time someone here has catered to me so thanks.

Anyway I like the look of a women's back more than her chest, although if it were an option:
legs legs legs legs legs!

Wait, asexual? I'd be grateful if you explained this to me.

The short of it is, in my case, I appreciate men and women aesthetically but I've never had any interest whatsoever in sticking anything of mine into anything of their. Ever.

Well this is going to be a bit of a personal question but I've never heard of "asexual" before so you've peeked my interest. Do you masturbate/get aroused? I understand if you don't want to answer.

An asexual is someone who feels no sexual attraction towards anyone, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexuality