Kendarik said:
Vault101 said:
Kendarik said:
Vern5 said:
If the drug was announced as being a "Cure for the gay", then yes, a lot of people would be pissed. It would be the same as offering a "Cure for the White" which sounds like medical genocide or a "Cure for the Gamer" which sounds like culture-o-cide. <- Needs revision.
That sounds like the deaf people that don't want children to have their hearing restored.
being deaf is a serious disabilty
Why? You are "born that way", just like you are born gay.
being gay? how is that any worse than say..being turned on by bondage or robots or feet? should we "cure" those people too because god forbid what people get up to in their bedrooms should be of great concerin to us "normal" people
So what's so wrong with being deaf? They have their own languages, cultures, what's intrinsically different about deaf and gay? Deaf people often argue that hearing people calling them disabled is offensive and its no more a medical condition/disability than being gay is.
It's not quite the same at all though is it? That's like saying not being able to walk or being blind isn't a disability, being gay doesn't stop you from doing anything, whereas being deaf disables your ability to hear, hence...disability.
Being born without hearing is a serious disability, think about how your life would be if you stopped being able to hear right now; no music, no verbal conversation, all movies with subtitles, only being able to converse with people who can speak sign language.
Complete and total silence, all the time, the only sound you get to hear is your own voice in your head, and if you were born deaf then I'm not sure what that would sound like as you'd have no concept of sound to begin with.
On a serious note can anyone answer that, can people born deaf hear their own voice in their head? They would've never of heard it so...?