I love the Tim Burton crowd, at least the teenage crowd, the majority of which take great pride in letting you know about the dark mystery of Tim Burtons films. They marvel at the gothic imagery and hail him as a "visionary", but fail to grasp that Burton doesn't really do anything special. Batman is shit, there was no need for the Planet of the Apes remake, Sweeney Todd should've stayed off-off-off-OFF Broadway, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was an abomination and The Nightmare Before Christmas wasn't him (He wrote a poem and drew some pictures). Personality starved teens (i.e. emos) love him, because his work is like them, shallow and uninteresting.
Most of his other films are fine, with a few stand-out gems like Ed Wood, Edward Scissorhands, and Mars Attacks, and Alice seems like it could go either way. It is Burton doing what he is know for, taking a childs fable and turning it into a polished gothic nightmare, without really making it so dark that it scares children out of the theatre, but Alice in Wonderland seems like a good fit for him.
All that being said, there is a high probability (In my mind) that Burton will f**k this up. This is Burton doing Burton, its the same old shtick. I get it, you like simple gothic stories that are as delightfully creepy as they are family friendly, that is great. I don't care. Burton seems to have taken on a project that was almost finished when he started, he simply has to cut and paste his by-the-numbers vision into the story and build some archways out of cardboard. I also take issue with Johnny Depp. Wow, Depp is playing a dissociative character with some sort of neurosis?! Thats so origina-OH, right. He is doing what he does in every Burton film, hes playing crazy. Sure its a different sort of crazy, but its still crazy. Depp's wealth of characters is drying up, they all seem to be running into each other like some sort of neurotically weird blur. So YAY for the Burtonites, but I think i'll wait for the DVD release.