Yes, that's entanglement. One particle's state cannot be fully expressed without another particle, ergo they are kinda identical, etc. Fun stuff!heavymedicombo said:Is it using quantum entanglement?thethingthatlurks said:Just as with this grammar thing. Damn punctuation marks...people are stupid for using 'em!Eaglesolidus said:if time travel were possible we would see people from the future and it would create a time paradox people are stupid for thinking its possible
*shrugs* In my work, we just give that problem to the engineers and let them worry about it. You wanted to know what teleportation is, and you've got it. It's not fancy, it's not convenient, but it's damn fun to think about.Staskala said:But in that case you only shift the problem from teleportation to creating artificial biological matter in less time than it would take to bring it there the "normal" way, which is equally ludicrous.thethingthatlurks said:No, the information is the key! otherwise you just have a bunch of elementary particles without any coherent...anything. It doesn't matter if you can transport matter. Matter is everywhere, you just need to present it with the correct information.only problem is that IT IS PHYSICALLY IMPPOSSIBLE TO GO AT/PAST THE SPEED OF LIGHT!SuperNashwan said:The moment we invent faster than light, or even near light speed travel, we essentially invent a time machine anyway. The closer you get to light speed, the slower time passes. If you travelled at light speed away from our planet for a day and came back, when you return to earth a great deal more than a day will have passed for those who stayed on earth. So from the point of view of the people in the spaceship, they have traveled into the future. Relativity is going to be a ***** for anyone who has appointments to keep.
Oh, and your last point: no, it's only impossible for a particle with real mass to exceed the speed of light. Subtle distinction, but it opens up a whole new field of theoretical headache inducing models.