I'll try to make this quick (see what I did there?). I'm not naming any names, but every now and then somebody will post a freaking novel in the forums. A few people will actually have a legitimate point to make, while many, many others flood the screen with incoherent drivel, but either way...does that just bug the hell out of anyone else? It's like when you're at what's supposed to be a group discussion, but then one guy gets up and grandstands for twenty minutes.
I've only ever used TL;DR as a response two or three times. It was mainly because I decided that certain posts fell into the pointless long-winded nonsense category, and therefore they were sorta-kinda asking for it. But I've seen a few anti-TL;DR arguments elsewhere, to the effect that "if you haven't got anything nice to say, don't say anything at all."
So now I'm curious. What do you think of TL;DRing: valid criticism of a post's signal-to-noise ratio, or just unnecessary rudeness?
I've only ever used TL;DR as a response two or three times. It was mainly because I decided that certain posts fell into the pointless long-winded nonsense category, and therefore they were sorta-kinda asking for it. But I've seen a few anti-TL;DR arguments elsewhere, to the effect that "if you haven't got anything nice to say, don't say anything at all."
So now I'm curious. What do you think of TL;DRing: valid criticism of a post's signal-to-noise ratio, or just unnecessary rudeness?