Note - before reading, be warned that there is a lot of information here. Please don't post any flame comments, anybody caught posting in a disrespectful or antagonistic way will be instantly reported to the mods by PM. I will be monitoring this thread closely since I don't relish the thought of having this thread, intended for serious debate, locked because of a few idiots. You have been warned.
So there's been talk at my university, the University of Leeds, about whether or not the BNP should be allowed to come to campus and discuss their policies with students in an open debate. Our Student Union has been extremely vocal in previous years about the BNP and the fact that they will not be welcome on campus, especially after last year a BNP rally against Music of Black Origin was held outside HMV in the city centre. Students organised a counter rally for the same day, yet the police argued and fought against the students rather than the actual BNP supporters. This year, now, there is widespread debate within the university about whether or not we should invite BNP representatives to campus to debate their policies with Leeds students.
Now, personally, I think we should. It's simply the case that the BNP are just another political party, but their policies are at worst extreme fascism and at best simply too far to the right. Personally I'm a Conservative voter. I have no problem with homosexuality. I have Asian, Afro-Carribean and Eatern European friends. I am partly Serbian on my dad's side, though I've never been there and consider myself fully English. So I definitely don't agree with the BNP's policies. But likewise, I don't agree with the EU, but if the EU were to send representatives to Leeds, or any other university in the UK, I wouldn't hesitate to grab the chance to discuss with them the EU policies, such as the Lisbon Treaty. So what makes the BNP so different? Is it simply that we don't want to give a platform to fascists because of the risk of backlash from the LGBT, Asian, Afro-Carribean, etc. communities at the university?
The situation is further compounded by the fact that last summer, the Leeds Student Union (LUU) held their annual election among (30,000) students in Leeds for a new Student Council. One of the new officers, who will remain unnamed (though if there are any other Leeds students here they'll know who I'm talking about), happens to be Jewish, and was involved in a bit of controversy last year when he allegedly yelled abuse at a group of demonstrators who had taken over a campus building in protest against the Israel/Palestine war. There hence remains a question over his impartiality, to a certain extent, and also (due to his religion) his own authority as a member of the Student Council over the decision to allow the BNP to come to campus for a debate.
So my question is this - Should we invite the BNP to campus? I'm especially interested to hear from any other Leeds students on the subject (though I respect that there will probably be very few Leeds students on The Escapist), as well as those in other universities across the country who may be engaged in similar debate. What are the pros and cons of letting students and the BNP discuss party policy? Is it the right of the BNP to be allowed onto campus under the terms of free speech? Does the student union have any right to stop them discussing policy on the Leeds campus? Please post your thoughts here, I'm eager to see what everyone has to say on the subject. Non-UK Escapists are also welcome to give their thoughts as well.
EDIT: For the record, although I doubt there are many BNP supporters here, if there are then I'd also be interested to know what their reaction and thoughts are. If any BNP supporters here do post, then please do NOT flame them or make any negative comments against them personally, I don't want any flaming, as I've said before. Thank you.
So there's been talk at my university, the University of Leeds, about whether or not the BNP should be allowed to come to campus and discuss their policies with students in an open debate. Our Student Union has been extremely vocal in previous years about the BNP and the fact that they will not be welcome on campus, especially after last year a BNP rally against Music of Black Origin was held outside HMV in the city centre. Students organised a counter rally for the same day, yet the police argued and fought against the students rather than the actual BNP supporters. This year, now, there is widespread debate within the university about whether or not we should invite BNP representatives to campus to debate their policies with Leeds students.
Now, personally, I think we should. It's simply the case that the BNP are just another political party, but their policies are at worst extreme fascism and at best simply too far to the right. Personally I'm a Conservative voter. I have no problem with homosexuality. I have Asian, Afro-Carribean and Eatern European friends. I am partly Serbian on my dad's side, though I've never been there and consider myself fully English. So I definitely don't agree with the BNP's policies. But likewise, I don't agree with the EU, but if the EU were to send representatives to Leeds, or any other university in the UK, I wouldn't hesitate to grab the chance to discuss with them the EU policies, such as the Lisbon Treaty. So what makes the BNP so different? Is it simply that we don't want to give a platform to fascists because of the risk of backlash from the LGBT, Asian, Afro-Carribean, etc. communities at the university?
The situation is further compounded by the fact that last summer, the Leeds Student Union (LUU) held their annual election among (30,000) students in Leeds for a new Student Council. One of the new officers, who will remain unnamed (though if there are any other Leeds students here they'll know who I'm talking about), happens to be Jewish, and was involved in a bit of controversy last year when he allegedly yelled abuse at a group of demonstrators who had taken over a campus building in protest against the Israel/Palestine war. There hence remains a question over his impartiality, to a certain extent, and also (due to his religion) his own authority as a member of the Student Council over the decision to allow the BNP to come to campus for a debate.
So my question is this - Should we invite the BNP to campus? I'm especially interested to hear from any other Leeds students on the subject (though I respect that there will probably be very few Leeds students on The Escapist), as well as those in other universities across the country who may be engaged in similar debate. What are the pros and cons of letting students and the BNP discuss party policy? Is it the right of the BNP to be allowed onto campus under the terms of free speech? Does the student union have any right to stop them discussing policy on the Leeds campus? Please post your thoughts here, I'm eager to see what everyone has to say on the subject. Non-UK Escapists are also welcome to give their thoughts as well.
EDIT: For the record, although I doubt there are many BNP supporters here, if there are then I'd also be interested to know what their reaction and thoughts are. If any BNP supporters here do post, then please do NOT flame them or make any negative comments against them personally, I don't want any flaming, as I've said before. Thank you.